The Tantura affair, in which post-Zionist Israel libels its own past.
Sep 10, 2001, Vol. 6, No. 48 • By MEYRAV WURMSER
SHORTLY AFTER KOSOVO leapt into the headlines worldwide and war crimes became the international subject of the hour, the Palestine Liberation Organization, ever quick to exploit political trends, set about likening Israel to Serbia. Spokesmen for the Palestinian cause demanded that the international community bomb Israel and ostracize and pursue its leaders, as it had Serbia and Slobodan Milosevic. They soon got help from an unexpected quarter: Far-left Israeli historians answered the call to elaborate the comparison. Before long, their effort to tarnish their nation had precipitated a major scandal in Israeli historiography known as the Tantura affair.
The stakes were clear: In the current climate of concern about war crimes, to tar Israel with atrocities—especially atrocities in its war of independence in 1948—would be deadly. The Serbs, after all, were in the dock for crimes committed in pursuit of empire. Once Serbia changes its behavior, it will rejoin the community of nations. But to show that Israel was born in sin, that the very act of its creation was a crime, would be to discredit the Jewish state once and for all.
The problem was, the postmodernist, "post-Zionist" historians lacked the raw facts from which to make the comparison—until, conveniently, a master’s thesis produced at Haifa University provided them with useful fodder. Written by a graduate student named Teddi Katz, this thesis addressed a delicate topic: the evacuation of Arab villages at the foot of southern Mount Carmel during the war of independence. Katz maintained that the Israel Defense Forces had killed more than 200 unarmed inhabitants of the Arab fishing village of Tantura on May 22-23, 1948, after the village had surrendered. It was an astonishing assertion. No massacre had previously been recorded in Tantura; indeed, no massacre of such magnitude had been recorded in all of Israeli history.
The story gained prominence after Katz, awarded the unusually high grade of 97 for his research, spoke to a reporter, who published an account of the Tantura massacre in the leading Israeli newspaper Ma’ariv on January21, 2000. Astonished veterans of the Israeli Alexandroni Brigade, the unit that had taken the village, sued Katz for libel, denying his account and asserting he had fabricated evidence. Leading figures in the Israeli peace camp made Katz’s defense their fund-raising cause du jour.
No wonder Katz admitted this. The trial had abundantly exposed the flimsiness or nonexistence of his evidence. To cite just two examples, Katz had quoted a surviving Arab villager, Abu Fahmi ‘Ali Daqnash, as saying that after the surrender of the village, Israeli soldiers had "often shot, killed, and wounded people." And he had quoted another villager, Abu Riyaj Muhammad Hatzadiyah, as saying, "I know that they shot young people after the fighting and that there was a big slaughter in the village, even after everyone surrendered and stopped fighting." No such statements appeared, however, in either Katz’s recordings or his notes of his interviews with the two men.
Nevertheless, twelve hours after signing his admission, Katz formally retracted it and sought to continue the trial. When the judge refused, he appealed to the district’s high court, but the appeal was dismissed without a hearing.
The prosecutor proceeded to urge Haifa University to strip Katz of his degree, whereupon the university set up two committees, one to check the accuracy of Katz’s research and the other to investigate whether his work had been properly supervised. The first committee found that Katz had "gravely and severely" falsified testimony at 14 different places in his thesis. The results of the second committee’s work are pending.