The author, Radcliffe '49, enjoys the late show.
Jul 27, 2009, Vol. 14, No. 42 • By CYNTHIA GRENIER
Then followed a list of five possibilities, concluding with "Call the Harvard Police."
Altogether some 39 members of the Class of 1949 made it to Cambridge, most from the environs, their voices still reflecting the Boston accents of my childhood, although two flew in from California and one from Florida. As one woman observed wryly, looking around the dinner table, "We've all become generic." We were not the only reunion convening at Harvard this year: Representatives from 1939, 1944, 1954, 1959, 1964, 1974, 1979, 1984, 1989, 1994, 1999, and 2004 were on hand as well.
The next morning we were driven in vans over to Harvard Yard to listen to a symposium on the arts--or so it was identified in the program. It turned out to be a fairly tedious discourse on Shakespeare with Professor Stephen (Will in the World) Greenblatt getting one of his pupils to recite a passage of Queen Gertrude from Hamlet addressing Laertes, illustrating how we could recognize the queen was lying.
Nicely enough executed, but relevant to our day and age? No. The Class of 1954 at least had symposia on "The Future of the Global Economy" and "Understanding America and the World." Who knows how interesting they were, but at least they were of our time.
Actually what may have been the most interesting day in Reunion Week was the discussion that took place among some 30 members of the Class of 1949. So many shared experiences: so many widows, so many living in assisted living facilities or contemplating such a move. Many like Raya Dreben, in the second class to include women who graduated from Harvard Law School, who is technically retired but working harder than ever as a consultant. A surprising number of Radcliffe women who had married on graduation had produced four children and now spoke of grandchildren--and even an occasional great-grand offspring.
Among all of these women who may not have known one another circa 1949, they clearly felt a kind of primordial bond--not a sentimental attachment but one that is genuinely moving on a fairly deep level. Somehow, something over the years had been learned.
It was also interesting to hear the number of women who complained how they had felt shut out, scorned by the Harvard professors, in their day. Our class was the first to share all courses with our Harvard classmates. Maybe it's because I grew up with a brother 18 years my senior, but I always felt comfortable with men at Harvard and never hesitated going around to ask questions or get to know the professors. I recollect talking a professor of Milton into raising my grade from B to B-plus because I had never had a B and his grade would ruin my record. He bought it!
This year's commencement took place in what was referred to as the Tercentenary Theatre, although it is not a theater per se but the area between the Memorial Church and Widener Library, decked out with three huge crimson Harvard banners. Flying overhead were the bright standards of the 13 undergraduate houses, occupied these years, of course, by both sexes.
Tall men in full morning dress, complete with cream-colored double-breasted waistcoats and black cardboard top hats--Harvard, hit by the recession, apparently was unable to afford the rental charge for silk toppers--directed the masses of classes swirling around Harvard Yard. The senior reunion classes were ordered to march into the theater between the rows of the graduating class of 2009, who cheered and applauded us on our way.
Yes, they all looked very terrifyingly young.
The commencement addresses were, on the whole, what you would expect--that is to say, high-minded banalities--although Secretary of Energy Steven Chu mercifully lightened his discourse with glints of wit and a welcome keen intelligence. The day before, the Harvard members of ROTC had received their commissions from General David Petraeus. In a video sent afterwards to all alumni, however, all mention of ROTC or General Petraeus was omitted.