Rich Man, Poor Man
Howard Dean struggles to get up from the canvas, Wesley Clark talks sense, and John Kerry gets in touch with his roots.
1:15 AM, Jan 22, 2004 • By JONATHAN V. LAST
New Hampshire, Wednesday, January 21
This morning the hive is packed with workers and a hefty contingent of press because Howard Dean is scheduled to address his campaign before retiring for the remainder of the day to his home in Burlington. The assemblage resembles nothing so much as a student-faculty mixer, with the mostly under-25 Deaniacs and the middle-age press corps eyeing one another suspiciously. When questioned about even the smallest matter, the Deaniacs dutifully explain that they shouldn't speak to the press without getting permission first.
When Dean enters the building, the room erupts in chants of "Pow-er! Pow-er!" and "We want our country back!" He is introduced by Jeremy Birde, whose story is ur-Deaniac:
About a year and a half ago, I had been tired of reading the papers every day, frustrated with the Bush administration and everything they had been doing to shatter all my values. And so I was working at Harvard Law School, I was doing a little bit of mediation and conflict-resolution work. . . . I went and heard [Howard Dean] speak. And it was the first time in my life that I left with hope. . . . About two months after that I left my job and came up here to New Hampshire.
Birde speaks about Dean in a soft, reverential tone, referring to the former governor as "Howard," and when Dean steps up onto the small riser that has been placed inconspicuously behind the lectern, the air is heavy with expectation. Two days ago, he let loose with his now-famous harangue after losing Iowa. Yesterday, when faced with a heckler, he broke into an odd, rickety rendition of "The Star-Spangled Banner."
Today, Dean resists playing to his audience. In a raspy voice he discusses campaign-finance reform (McCain-Feingold is not enough, he says, "I want to put into law what this campaign has done") and the problems with corporate-controlled media outlets (read: Fox). It's a speech largely devoid of applause lines.
What's more, Dean looks and sounds exhausted. Twice he stumbles through passages of the speech, once almost losing his way entirely.
More worrisome is that since being drubbed in Iowa, Dean has had only three public events in two days, opting to spend much of his time home in Vermont. It's possible that Dean is using this time to retool. In 2000, George W. Bush was beaten badly in New Hampshire; he went to ground in Texas for a couple days and emerged with new themes and rhetoric, including the tagline "A Reformer with Results." With three events and an important debate scheduled for Thursday, Dean 2.0 might be on the way.
Another possibility is that the doctor is rattled. For all his pugnacity, Dean has never faced an electoral setback before and it's not a given that he'll recover. He's going to have to prove that he can take a punch.
(An aside: Democratic sophisticates often deride George W. Bush for his mispronunciation of the word "nuclear"--he says it "Nuc-u-lar"--but it's worth noting that both Howard Dean and Wesley Clark have their own speech tics. Dean pronounces "ideas" as "idears" and Clark says "warsh" instead of "wash.")
2:00 P.M., University of New Hampshire, Durham: Billed as a talk "about his plan to fix the mess in Iraq," Wesley Clark has come to the University of New Hampshire still preoccupied with the State of the Union speech. But gone is the rhetoric and Bush bashing--the roughly 240 students and faculty are treated to a thoughtful discourse.
Criticizing the president's June 30 deadline for handing over power in Iraq, Clark says, "we'll be less safe if we leave in haste and leave behind a mess." "There is no easy way out of Iraq," he explains. "And every American should understand this: an early exit means retreat or early defeat and we can't afford either. . . . It's only success that can provide for our security and honor the sacrifices of those who have served. It's only success that will allow Iraq to stand on its own. And it's only success that will allow us to bring our soldiers home the right way."
Clark then goes on to agree that the United Nations was "unable" and "unwilling" to help in Iraq and calls for a new international body to help aid in reconstruction.