ON DECEMBER 20, Russia's main legislative body, the State Duma, reaffirmed its faith in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). The Commonwealth is the oldest multilateral institution linking all the former Soviet republics except the Baltic states. In their statement, Duma members declared: "The Commonwealth of Independent States meets the interests of all its members and the international community. It has potential for development and cooperation in all directions."
Missed Opportunities at Minsk
Russia's legislatures must truly be placing hope over experience. For the Commonwealth, 2006 represented one of the worst years in its history. At the end of November 2006, the leaders of the CIS governments held their annual summit in the Belarusian capital of Minsk. Apparently by coincidence, the meeting occurred at the same time as the NATO summit in nearby Riga, Latvia.
The main item on the CIS summit's agenda was the organization's renewal. An ad hoc group formed after the Commonwealth's 2005 summit in Kazakhstan had drafted a 42-page report offering reforms designed to improve the institution's effectiveness and efficiency. Vladimir Garkun, the CIS senior deputy executive secretary, said that if they did not adopt this comprehensive restructuring plan, the CIS leaders would call into question the organization's very existence.
In the event, the summit attendees failed this test. The member governments did agree to enhance their cooperation against organized crime and terrorism. For example, they adopted measures on fighting human trafficking and other forms of illegal migration. They also signed accords to provide judges with better personal protection
and to combat money laundering. As in their other recent summits, however, the attendees postponed making the tough decisions on major restructuring until the next summit, currently scheduled for the summer of 2007 in St. Petersburg. In the interim, they instructed their foreign ministers to draft and present an agreed reform concept by July.
The members' divergent visions of the CIS's proper role in the "post-Soviet space" largely explain its paralysis. On the one extreme, Kazakhstan President Nursultan Nazarbayev had has been pushing for years for a major restructuring and strengthening of the organization. At the July 2006 meeting, he proposed the CIS pursue new initiatives in the areas of cross-border crime, migration, and transportation. He also suggested several cost-cutting measures.
On the other hand, the leaders of Ukraine and Georgia see the organization primarily as a mechanism for consultations with follow CIS leaders, a concept derisively referred to as a "presidential club" by its critics. For example, they sought to use the Minsk meeting to discuss one-on-one with Putin problems in their bilateral relations with Russia. (In the end, Putin refused to meet directly with Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili.) Even such close CIS allies as Russia and Belarus are divided over key issues like whether to adopt a common currency and what the price other CIS members should pay for Russia's oil and gas.
Troubled History
After the USSR's disintegration, the CIS initially represented the most important institution connecting the former Soviet republics. Nine of its members (including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Russia) signed a CIS Collective Security Treaty (CST) at a 1992 summit in Tashkent. According to its provisions, they pledged to assist one another in case of external aggression. The CST signatories also agreed to cooperate to resolve conflicts between treaty members, a clause which Russia used (along with bilateral agreements) to legitimize its continued military presence in many CIS member states.
|
