The MagazineWhat Putin Stands ForPlanes, uranium, tanks, infrastructure, and nuclear power for sale.Apr 23, 2007, Vol. 12, No. 30
• By REUBEN F. JOHNSON
Kiev "The old Soviet music with these new lyrics," says the Coca-Cola executive, "reminds all of the people what was good about the Soviet times plus what they have to be proud of now as Russians. It instills a sense of patriotism that the previous hymn adopted under Boris Yeltsin [for which no lyrics were ever written] did not. In the same vein as this decision we have a commercial proposal for you." "We propose that you ditch the red, blue, and white vertical-tricolor Russian flag and replace it with the old Soviet flag," he says. "Only with one small difference. If you will place a small Coca-Cola logo in white on the flag's red background in the bottom right-hand corner our company is ready to finance your entire election campaign. That is, whenever you decide how you will change the Russian constitution so you can run for a third term." "That is an interesting proposal," answers the Russian president, "but I will have to consult with my advisers before accepting." Putin then hangs up and summons his chief of staff and prime minister. "Comrades, we have another proposal about changing the flag," he tells them, "but this one is quite a bit more attractive, and I think we should consider it. But first, tell me--how much time do we have left on the current flag contract with Aquafresh toothpaste?" There are two truths in this joke: One--under Putin, the personal financial interests of the state apparatchiki have become completely inbred with the national interest. The entirety of state-owned and controlled enterprises are run by and for the benefit of the cabal around Putin--a collection of former KGB colleagues, St. Petersburg lawyers, and other political cronies. This band of comrades has managed to place all of the large money-making industries under their control--so much so that the thought of losing their grip when the Russian president's second term ends next year is a source of rising anxiety for his inner circle. The second truth is that the idea of a Putin third term is less of a joke with each passing day. The possibility has been talked about incessantly within political circles as well as on the street--and most Russians have assumed that some form of parliamentary chicanery would eventually be invoked in order to make it a reality. But there have been no official steps proposed along these lines. That is, until late afternoon on the last Friday in March, when Sergei Mironov, speaker of the Federation Council (the Russian parliament's upper chamber), called for the Russian constitution to be amended to allow Putin to remain in office beyond the end of his second term. The Kremlin immediately reiterated Putin's stated position opposing such an amendment. But the call for a "presidency without an end" by Mironov--the most senior official to make the suggestion--shows that panic is beginning to set in among those who will lose power and influence when Putin leaves. Garry Kasparov, the former Russian chess master and a Putin opponent, called a press conference in response to Mironov's proposal, which he characterized as "hysterical weeping" by those in Putin's entourage who are afraid of losing their positions (along with the luxury apartments, BMW sedans, and other perks). "They understand that Putin will not stay on, but they do not know what to do next," he told the assembled Moscow press corps. But it is not just a comfy lifestyle and other privileges that could come crashing down once Putin exits the presidency. What is at stake is a multi-billion dollar business empire. A year ago, the New York Times Moscow bureau produced an article entitled "Workers' Paradise Is Rebranded as Kremlin, Inc." that described how the presidential apparatus under Putin had taken control of virtually all of the nation's industrial wealth. But the Times does not know the half of it. The Kremlin's control over the state-run natural gas monopoly Gazprom, Putin's breakup and seizure of the oil company Yukos, and the expropriation of other valuable natural resource operations (namely, the regulatory sleight-of-hand that was used to hijack the Western-financed Sakhalin 2 oil and gas exploration project) have been well publicized in the West. But another Kremlin monopoly is even more ominous. |
|