Happy, productive peasants can't be wrong: Socialist Realism lives!
Dec 1, 2008, Vol. 14, No. 11 • By KATHERINE EASTLAND
Art and China's Revolution
At the Yan'an Forum on
The New York Asia Society believes that this art warrants a second look, both for its aesthetic merit and for its legacy. As the contemporary Chinese artist Xu Bing notes, "If you want to probe deeply into the underpinnings of contemporary Chinese art, you have to consider the influence of the Cultural Revolution on my generation because it was an entirely unique experience." Which makes sense, since these artists grew up in the endless parade of Mao's face. One painting alone--Liu Chunhua's "Chairman Mao Goes to Anyuan" (1969)--was reprinted, by some estimates, 900 million times.
Understanding the significance of the era, cocurators Melissa Chiu and Zheng Shengtian have spent five years preparing this landmark exhibition. On view are over 250 works, many of which have never been exhibited in the United States, or exhibited at all. Though these 250 works, ranging from prints to paintings to sculptures, cover the many facets of Maoist art, more would have been on view had the Ministry of Culture in Beijing not frustrated the society's plans to exhibit 100 Mao-related works which have been sitting in storage (and without public access) in Chinese galleries for decades. The Chinese refusal to grant the necessary loan permits is a blatant attempt to censor a show on a subject the Ministry of Culture deems too sensitive for discussion--or disagreement.
As Chiu and Zheng know too well, "Art and China's Revolution" is a show that could not happen in China today. They were told, unofficially, by Chinese officials that the ministry refused the permits because of the show's timing. The opening date was uncomfortably close to the Olympics, a time for China to impress the world as a formidable, forward-looking nation. Reminding that same global audience--and in the cultural capital of the United States, no less--of China's stained past was something the Ministry of Culture had no desire to endorse. And yet, of course, their decision had the opposite effect: It just made China look worse.
The New York Asia Society, it must be noted, is not a museum. It has a permanent collection of art, and rooms for special exhibitions; but it is primarily a "nonpartisan, nonprofit educational institution" with offices here and across Asia designed to "enhance dialogue, encourage creative expression, and generate new ideas across the fields of policy, business, education, arts, and culture." And so it makes sense that the Asia Society would put on a show whose temper is academic, careful, reserved--and above all, diplomatic.
Mao's misdeeds aren't belabored here. The focus isn't even on him; it's on art itself and the artists who clocked in the hours to make it. To illustrate that important shift in focus, Chiu and Zheng arranged for six of the artists appearing in the show to answer questions and tell stories at a press preview. In so doing, they could prove that they painted in more than Communist red and that their work transcends "propaganda." As Zheng told us, "I want you to see beyond propaganda, to see the lives of artists. That is our hope."
It's according to that hope that he and Chiu arranged the works. The first rooms address Mao directly, as if he were a hill to climb so that the rest of the show can proceed downhill. Here the visitor finds a wealth of Mao memorabilia: Mao magazines and newspapers and Little Red Books, including one blue-jacketed copy from the 1964 trial edition; vases printed with slogans such as "Bombard the headquarters, my big-character poster!"; medallions and buttons plastered with Mao's face; teacups and teapots emblazoned with scenes from revolutionary ballets such as The Red Detachment of Women; red matchboxes and cigarette packs featuring cartoon soldiers; and even one commemorative glass mango, revered as a modern relic and symbol of Mao-thought.