The Magazine

The Shame of the Senate

Fifty-eight pols to inner-city kids: Drop dead.

Mar 23, 2009, Vol. 14, No. 26 • By MARY KATHARINE HAM
Widget tooltip
Single Page Print Larger Text Smaller Text Alerts

The porch light is on at a modest townhouse in Northeast D.C. Inside, there's a strategy session that looks nothing like the ones held behind the closed doors of Congress. School-choice activist Virginia Walden-Ford is chatting with her sister and local parents. A little girl is perched on the arm of an overstuffed chair, watching American Idol. A troop of boys clatters down the narrow stairway, spilling into the living room and scattering shoes and action figures in the process. Conversation seamlessly stops and starts amid questions for moms or hugs for "Miss Virginia," as the kids call her.

"I fight for these children," says Walden-Ford. "And I will fight till I die. People think I'm saying that lightly, and I'm not. I will fight till I can't fight anymore because I feel these kids deserve this program."

Miss Virginia is the voice of school choice in Washington, D.C. She fought for years for the Opportunity Scholarship, a pilot school-choice program that serves 1,700 District kids from families with an average annual income of $23,000. It passed the Republican-controlled Senate in 2004, but only by two votes and after Walden-Ford spent months shuttling parents and kids to Capitol Hill every day, to the offices of the encouraging and the intractable alike.

The program has produced an Archbishop Carroll High School valedictorian, four years of positive reviews in a Georgetown University study of attitudes about the program, and a perennially high demand for scholarships. Yet success wasn't enough to keep the program safe in a Democrat-controlled Congress.

The Opportunity Scholarship's $14 million in yearly funding was nixed last week by Senator Dick Durbin, who inserted language in the $410 billion omnibus spending bill to sunset the program at the end of the next school year. On the Senate floor, he and ally Chuck Schumer attributed their action to a newfound interest in evaluating federal programs for effectiveness. Neither mentioned that Durbin counts the National Education Association among his top 10 lifetime contributors. Nor did they mention that Head Start, a federal pre-K education program, which has yet to present the evaluation required by its 1998 reauthorization, was nonetheless funded to the tune of $7 billion in the same bill.

"I had hoped that the successes of these kids would just speak for themselves," Walden-Ford says, the moms in the room shaking their heads in somber agreement as the room turned serious. "I can't even imagine telling these kids they have to go back to public schools."

Nevada Republican John Ensign offered an amendment to strike the Durbin language, but it was predictably defeated, 58-39. Now, school-choice supporters' only hope is a re-authorization vote. (The program must also be approved by the D.C. City Council, another obstacle built into Durbin's language.)

The battle will not be easy in a Democratic Congress, but there's some reason to be optimistic, says Andrew Campanella, a spokesman for Alliance for School Choice. "Support is definitely building," he said. "The fight is not over."

Though she voted against Ensign's amendment, Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein spoke forcefully in favor of school choice, saying it's important for revamping education.

"I don't believe youngsters from lower income families should be denied the opportunity to learn in these smaller, more personal settings," Feinstein said. "I believe we need different models for children to learn."

Feinstein, who voted for the program in 2004, was encouraged by a letter from D.C. mayor Adrian Fenty, who supports keeping the Opportunity Scholarship, as does Obama's secretary of education, Arne Duncan. (Both are generally ambivalent about vouchers.)

This spring, the Department of Education is set to release the final study in a series on the D.C. scholarships. Previous evaluations have shown improvement for subgroups in math and science, when compared with public-school peers, and significant improvement in parental satisfaction. Activists predict similar results this spring, and insist they will force Senate Democrats to follow through on their fact-finding instead of letting the program slowly drown in the seas of Senate procedure.

Patricia William is one parent who found satisfaction in a private school after her son, Fransoir, 12, struggled with large class sizes in public schools. A naturalized citizen from El Salvador and a nurse's assistant, she was riding the bus one morning, fretting about Fransoir's last bad school day, when she saw an ad for the scholarship.

"I got kind of sentimental, but I didn't want people to see me cry," William says. "I just wrote it down."