Asked to comment on the controversy earlier today, Rudoren scoffed at her Twitter critics and defended her credibility on the issue of Israel.
“It was a quick tweet of a tidbit,” Rudoren, who ignited a firestorm earlier this year when she used Twitter to reach out to some of Israel’s fiercest critics, explained in an email.
“I wasn’t saying there was equivalency, just noting they were side by side in his list, which, again, in this moment, seemed worthy of a quick mention,” Rudoren said. “That’s how I see Twitter—a medium for a quick note—hey, look at this—as opposed to an in-depth exploration.”
She maintained that it is perfectly acceptable to make note of the report, even if it was flawed.
“To suggest that noting the existence of a CJR study, even if flawed, is anti-Semitic
seems entirely out of proportion. Anti-Semitism is about intent, right? So the suggestion is that I put the tweet out to hurt/destroy Jews? Seriously? A tweet? It’s a platform for conversation, for sharing information—and, sure, for debunking or critiquing that information,” Rudoren wrote.