Joe Biden, Truth-teller
From The Scrapbook
Oct 17, 2011, Vol. 17, No. 05 • By THE SCRAPBOOK
Joe Biden has gotten his share of mockery—not least in these precincts—for his tendency to yack a little too much. Indeed, it’s such a commonplace observation that the vice president now publicly kids himself about it, in much the same way that Ronald Reagan used his age to humorous advantage (“I’m not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent’s youth and inexperience”).
So The Scrapbook is inclined to rush to Mr. Biden’s defense this week in the aftermath of his observation to NBC’s David Gregory:
When Gregory asked Biden whether a Republican nominee could defeat President Obama for reelection next year, the vice president replied, “Oh, absolutely, absolutely. It’s strong enough to beat both of us.”
These remarks have been greeted with delighted wonderment on the right—there he goes again!—and deep consternation on the left: Biden is giving aid and comfort to the enemy!
The Scrapbook, however, chooses to be neutral in judgment. The vice president’s words speak for themselves, and it is difficult to argue with what he says: The economy is in a tailspin and unemployment remains high; polls confirm that Americans think the country is moving in the wrong direction; the combination of these factors undeniably imperils Barack Obama’s reelection.
Indeed, so far as The Scrapbook is concerned, the problem here is not what Biden said—which seems obvious now, and could change in the next 13 months—but the reaction to Biden’s words. For once, a politician has answered a question with a candid appraisal, devoid of self-protective verbiage. We are so accustomed to partisan spin and language-as-smokescreen that we are surprised and indignant when someone actually says what
The Scrapbook is not in the habit of comparing American politics unfavorably with the customs of our European friends, but this is one instance where the Europeans have the upper hand. A French politician, assessing a defeat, would never insult his listeners by denying what has happened, or changing the subject. On federal election nights in Germany, the major party leaders will gather with journalists in a television studio and assess the results with shocking objectivity. Members of Britain’s parliament will disagree publicly with party colleagues; dissenting cabinet members resign on principle.
Such candor is not a sign of weakness or irresolution, in The Scrapbook’s view, but democratic maturity. So it speaks to the interesting political times in which we live that Joe Biden—yes, good old garrulous, motor-mouth Joe—comes off as the grownup in this minor political episode.
Et tu, Tutu?
Across The Scrapbook’s desk the other day passed a landmark in the annals of political correctness. Tutu: Authorized tells the story of Desmond Tutu, the Anglican archbishop of Cape Town who became a celebrity of the 1980s antiapartheid movement. It is crammed with photos, in color and black and white, of Archbishop Tutu helping, hugging, and exhorting the poor. It has testimonials to “the Arch,” as he is jauntily called, from Jimmy Carter, Richard Branson, Jackson Browne, Bob Geldof, Harry Belafonte, and Carlos Santana (whose short biography identifies him as “a Mexican-born American rock icon”). There is also a narrative of Tutu’s life put together by the journalist Allister Sparks, with the help of Tutu’s daughter, and the ghostwriter of Tutu’s children’s book Desmond and the Very Mean Word. There are two testimonial introductions—one from Bono, one from the Dalai Lama. They constitute a nihil
obstat from Rev. Tutu’s church, by which we mean not the Church of England but the Church of the Great and the Good.
The Scrapbook is as happy as anyone that South Africans need no longer endure apartheid, and considers Tutu’s role in that transformation a positive one. It was not, however, unambiguously positive. Tutu was better at opposing the West’s complicity in apartheid than he was at understanding why the West was inclined to worry about communism when it looked at the African National Congress. His labeling of the apartheid regime as unjust was based on expertise; his more recent labeling of the Gaza blockade as a war crime is based on groupthink. It is not The Scrapbook’s aim to dredge up his failings. If complacent bloviation accompanied his genuine courage, he is not the first person of whom that can be said. He is only human.