The Magazine

Washington on Fire

Why the War of 1812 is our second war of independence.

Sep 3, 2012, Vol. 17, No. 47 • By RYAN COLE
Widget tooltip
Single Page Print Larger Text Smaller Text Alerts

Louis Serurier, a French diplomat stationed in Washington in the early 19th century, observed that the War of 1812 lent America “what it so essentially lacked, a national character founded on a common glory to all.” The American war effort was hardly flawless, and the final outcome may have been inconclusive, but battling Great Britain to something resembling a draw gave an adolescent country a sense of national purpose, some international prestige, and a final, definite separation from the Crown. 

‘A boxing match, or another bloody nose for John Bull’ by William Charles (1813)

‘A boxing match, or another bloody nose for John Bull’ by William Charles (1813)

Everett

But the two intervening centuries have been unkind to that legacy. The war’s bicentennial, now upon us, has so far mostly offered commentators a chance to reflect on how little Americans care about their second war of independence, and how the little they do know is stitched together from questionable sources (Johnny Horton’s “The Battle of New Orleans,” for example).

Perhaps fittingly, Congress, regarding the occasion as less important than the 200th anniversaries of the Lewis and Clark expedition and Abraham Lincoln’s birth, declined to give this bicentennial the lavish, taxpayer-funded treatment afforded to its predecessors. So with no national commemoration, the relevant states, cities, sites, and museums are organizing various smaller activities to mark the occasion. Whether the results will be a string of reminders about (and hand-wringing over) our indifference to the war remains to be seen. 

One of the first efforts, however, currently on view at the National Portrait Gallery, opens the festivities on a promising note. “1812: A Nation Emerges” gathers paintings, prints, and artifacts to present an exciting and remarkably coherent account of a complicated conflict. 

Unsurprisingly, given the venue, a sizable portion of the show is dedicated to portraits. Some of these depict well-known personages: Andrew Jackson, the bristly hero of the Battle of New Orleans, captured in an uncharacteristically serene gaze by Charles Willson Peale; and Gilbert Stuart’s elegant 1804 renderings of a youthful James and Dolley Madison, the improbable wartime commander in chief and his vivacious first lady.  

Other faces, though less familiar, are no less striking. Stuart’s likeness of General William Hull, painted years after his surrender of Fort Detroit to the British and his subsequent court-martial, catches a touch of humiliation in Hull’s weary eyes. In sharp contrast, the young and rising cohort of American military men—Stephen Decatur, William Henry Harrison, Winfield Scott, Oliver Hazard Perry—appear heroic, dashing, and resplendent in their uniforms. Two of the exhibit’s most arresting images are of the enemy: Thomas Lawrence’s breathtaking portrait of the British foreign minister, Viscount Castlereagh, and John James Halls’s magnificent painting of Admiral George Cockburn posed jauntily in front of his handiwork, the city of Washington engulfed in flames and burning to the ground. 

This collection alone would make for a worthy exhibit. But “A Nation Emerges” skillfully supplements the portraits with a wealth of documents and objects that link the actors to the war’s origins, course, and aftermath: a battered copy of Madison’s proclamation of war, with its echoes of the Declaration of Independence; Dolley’s velvet dress; a copy of the president’s personal catalogue of government receipts (swiped from the Capitol by an invading Redcoat); a Congreve rocket that inspired the red glare of Francis Scott Key’s “Star-Spangled Banner”; the war’s concluding document from 1814, the Treaty of Ghent, with its red wax seals and signatures still lustrous and clearly legible 200 years later. Contemporary engravings, cartoons, and paintings of crucial battles contextualize the war’s political underpinnings and capture its drama.  

The objects not only narrate, they also offer a physical, three-dimensional connection to a largely forgotten segment of our history. Especially absorbing are the glimpses of the British invasion and burning of Washington in August 1814. Contemporary engravings and paintings of the chaotic flight from the city, as well as the shelled and burnt White House and Capitol building, are jarring to American eyes—even in our post-9/11 world. 

Recent Blog Posts

The Weekly Standard Archives

Browse 18 Years of the Weekly Standard

Old covers