The Blog

94 Congressmen Question Park Service's Decision to Close Select 'Urban, Open-Air Memorials'

10:06 AM, Oct 10, 2013 • By DANIEL HALPER
Widget tooltip
Single Page Print Larger Text Smaller Text Alerts

In a letter sent yesterday to Jonathan Jarvis, director of the National Park Service, 94 members of Congress question the federal government's decision to close open-air memorials during the federal government shutdown.

All signatories are Republicans. The letter was sent to 23 Democratic offices in the House, but all refused to sign on.

The members of Congress have 6 basic question for Jarvis:

  1. Multiple lower profile open-air memorials and areas remain open on the National Mall and around the National Capital Region.  What factors were considered when the determination was made to close some areas, while leaving others open?
  1. During the partial government shutdown of 1995 and 1996 the currently closed memorials on the National Mall remained open.  What were the contributing factors to this change in NPS policy?
  1. What is the cost to operate an open-air site such as the World War II Memorial on a typical day?  How much is the National Park Service saving per day at that memorial by operating in its current “shutdown” posture?
  1. What is the estimated total cost to install barricades and patrol the perimeter of each open-air memorial and area during the shutdown.  What is the total cost to breakdown and remove all barricades once normal operations resume? 
  1. On multiple occasions since the shutdown began, members and staff have counted as many as seven NPS employees on-site at the World War II Memorial.  How many NPS staff members are assigned to these memorials during a normal shift? 
  2. Initially, NPS logo signs were posted at each of the closed memorials indicating that the area was closed due to the government shutdown.  On the second day of the shutdown the signs were removed and replaced with new, non-logo signs simply stating that “This site is closed”.  Why were the original signs replaced and who requested the change? How much did it cost to remove and replace these signs?

The letter was organized by Bill Huizenga of Michigan. "The National Park Service continues to act in an arbitrary and punitive manner to exclude veterans from memorials built in their honor and the American people from many of our country's national treasures," Huizenga says in a statement released with the letter. "I have serious questions about the tactics and decisions being implemented by the National Park Service and clearly many of my colleagues do as well," said Huizenga.  "Director Jarvis cannot simply make up the rules as he goes along, which is one of the major reasons my colleagues and I sent this letter requesting concrete and definitive answers."  

Here's the full text of the letter and the signatories:

Jonathan B. Jarvis

Director - National Park Service 

U.S. Department of the Interior 

1849 C St. NW

Washington D.C. 20240

Dear Director Jarvis:

As you are no doubt aware, the closure of select open-air monuments and park service units during the ongoing partial government shutdown has been a cause of great concern for the public.

In particular, the barricades erected around open-air sites like the World War II, Korean War, and Vietnam War memorials served to inconvenience countless veterans travelling to Washington, D.C. as part of honor flights from around the country.

It is our understanding that specific park closures were determined according to the Contingency Plan for Operations in the Absence of FY 2014 Appropriations dated September 26, 2013.  The National Park Service section of that plan clearly states that:

           

    All concession operated services and facilities would be closed unless they are deemed essential for health and safety reasons, are needed to support on-going excepted NPS activities or are located in urban areas where full             NPS law enforcement coverage is continued due to the inability to control visitor access.

 

These urban, open-air memorials seem to be precisely the type of exception outlined in the Department’s plan and, as such, should remain open to the public.

 

Recent Blog Posts