The Blog

Economic Face Off

12:00 AM, Jan 19, 2013 • By IRWIN M. STELZER
Widget tooltip
Single Page Print Larger Text Smaller Text Alerts

Take heart: There is more going on than meets the naked ear. Yes, the mud-slinging contest that has replaced serious policymaking in Washington continues, with President Obama the clear winner last week when he told a nationally televised press conference that House Republicans “have suspicions about whether government should make sure that kids in poverty are getting enough to eat...” This assessment of the motives of those who want to cut spending came while the capital was preparing for tomorrow’s second inauguration of Barack Obama. No search for comity just yet.

ryan and obama

The Republicans continue to say they will not raise the debt ceiling, or fund the government, unless the president agrees to cut spending as part of a program to bring the $1 trillion annual deficit under control. “It is possible that we would shut down the government to make sure President Obama understands that we’re serious” about cutting spending, said Cathy McMorris Rodgers, the Washington state Republican who chairs the party’s House conference.

So much for threats by Republicans and what Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Charles Krauthammer characterized as “essentially a libel” by Obama. This is what passes for negotiation in Washington. A more realistic appraisal of the likelihood of a plunge off still another fiscal cliff is that it is unlikely. The president has been saying that he is willing to consider some reductions in entitlements, perhaps by changing the social security (pension) cost-of-living escalator and introducing means testing of health care and other benefits. And important Republicans, and the party’s supporters in the business community, have launched an effort to persuade the Tea Partiers and other House Republicans that use of the nuclear weapon— shutting down the government, completely or in part—might have considerable collateral damage: the party’s ability to win congressional seats in 2014 and the White House in 2016.

House Republicans gathered at week’s end in Colonial Williamsburg to plan tactics for the coming showdowns with Obama. The proverbial reliable source tells me that they know that “they have to get through this patch” without the intra-party brawl that the president is attempting to provoke, and that “default is a bad fight to have.” At least just now. Paul Ryan gathered strong support for the idea of a three month extension to give Republicans time to negotiate over the sequester and funding for government operations, with the threat of the debt ceiling held in reserve. It is not clear why they think that, having shown themselves unwilling to use that weapon, the president will find their threat to resume the cry of “wolf” more terrifying than he so far has.   And why they don’t understand that the nation just might be better off if this battle were concluded sooner rather than later remains a puzzle, at least to those who believe that the national interest should have some place in Republicans’ ruminations.

The sequester battle, Republicans think, is “a good fight to have.” Discretionary spending, about $1.35 trillion per year, constitutes about one-third of total spending. Unlike entitlements such as social security and Medicare, discretionary spending, which includes everything from the military to maintenance of the Capitol, must be funded every year by Congress, with presidential approval. If no deal is reached the sequester takes effect, cutting about 8-9 percent, or some $100 billion, from discretionary spending. “Museums might have to close one-day each week, and government agencies get by on less than they are accustomed to, but that might not be a tragedy and is an opportunity to see if these agencies can indeed do with less,” my source tells me Republicans are thinking. That would pain conservatives who feel the military is already devoid of “fat,” but might be better for the nation than no spending cuts at all. Besides, the sequester would cut into some of the president’s favorite programs, which just might bring him to the negotiating table.

The combination of a sequester, the recent 2 percent increase in payroll taxes ($20 per week from the average pay check), the Obamacare tax and other taxes on the wealthy will take an estimated 1.8 percent out of GDP. Since the economy was forecast to grow at that rate or less in the first quarter, we will see zero or slightly negative growth early in the year.

Recent Blog Posts

The Weekly Standard Archives

Browse 20 Years of the Weekly Standard

Old covers