The Blog

The EPA's Abuse of Power

The government's startlingly aggressive and dishonest campaign against natural gas.

1:43 PM, Aug 17, 2011 • By MARIO LOYOLA
Widget tooltip
Single Page Print Larger Text Smaller Text Alerts

If you're looking for a dramatic example of a government regulatory agency run amok, consider EPA’s arbitrary and shameful attack on one Texas natural gas company. 

Epaheadquarters

In December 2009, one Steven Lipsky noticed a problem with his water well at his new home just west of Dallas, Texas.   He began to suspect that the source was a nearby natural gas well that Range Resources had built and “fracked” earlier that year to exploit a part of the massive Barnet Shale a mile underground.

The technique of hydraulic fracturing, which permits extraction of oil and gas from impermeable rock such as hard shale, has vastly increased the country’s recoverable reserves of energy. In the last year, the U.S. has doubled its estimate of the recoverable natural gas in the U.S., and a single new find, the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania and New York, is thought to contain more total energy than all of Saudi Arabia. 

Naturally, the prospect of a boom in fossil fuel production has driven environmentalists crazy. Environmental activists soon made contact with Mr. Lipsky, told him to watch a largely fraudulent documentary called Gasland, and encouraged him to bring EPA into the action quickly. In later summer 2010, he duly filed a complaint with both federal and state regulators. 

EPA testing soon showed that there were traces of methane in his drinking water, and that, like the methane deep in the Barnet Shale, it was “thermogenic” rather than “biogenic.”  All that proved was that both samples had come from deep underground, which was obvious anyway.  But that was all the EPA needed to slap Range Resources with an endangerment finding and remediation order.  “We know they’ve polluted the well,” claimed EPA regional administrator Al Armendariz in a television interview at the time.  “We know they’re getting natural gas in there.”

In fact, Armendariz didn’t know anything.  A week after the EPA order, its staff met with the company, which wanted to find out just how EPA thought it had polluted the well.  The gas from the company’s well could only have gotten into Mr. Lipsky’s well in one of two ways: either it had migrated vertically over 5000 feet up to the Trinity Aquifer as a result of 10 days of fracking the new well, or it had migrated into the aquifer from a mechanical integrity failure in the well pipe.  EPA staff agreed that fracking could not have caused the contamination, because there were no faults extensive enough to permit migration of gas over such a great distance.  And they did not dispute the veracity of the pressure-testing that confirmed the mechanical integrity of the well. They couldn’t propose a single theory as to how the gas had gotten into the well. 

Range challenged the order in court, and after EPA fought mightily to avoid having anyone testify at all, a federal judge ordered EPA to provide information about its investigation and make someone available for a sworn deposition.  Under oath, regional EPA enforcement chief John Blevins was confronted with internal emails in which an EPA engineer warned that the simple methane isotope test EPA had conducted was not “conclusive” proof.  

Range lawyers asked Mr. Blevins whether he was aware that many of the water wells in the area had contained natural gas long before any drilling.  He was.  Had he seen the email from an outside scientist telling EPA that it had to “evaluate the potential for other sources that would be thermogenic and the geology or structures that would store or transmit the gas from origin to aquifer.”  He had.  Had EPA had considered other possible geological sources of the gas in the Lipsky well?  It had not. 

In other words, EPA hadn’t even completed the most elementary investigation before issuing the “emergency order.”  If they had, they would have quickly realized what the source of the gas was.  Just beneath the Trinity Aquifer, from which the Lipsky well draws its water, is a rock strata laden with natural gas and salt water called the Strawn formation, which extends down to about 400 feet underground.  Over 5,000 feet below that is the Barnett Shale, from which Range was extracting natural gas.  

Recent Blog Posts

The Weekly Standard Archives

Browse 18 Years of the Weekly Standard

Old covers