The Blog

Issa Asks Lerner Devastating Questions

10:46 AM, Mar 5, 2014 • By DANIEL HALPER
Widget tooltip
Single Page Print Larger Text Smaller Text Alerts

Darrell Issa asked Lois Lerner a serier of devastating questions about her involvment in the IRS's targeting of conservatives. 

[Slide 1] In October 2010, you told a Duke University group: “The Supreme Court dealt a huge blow, overturning a 100-year-old precedent that basically corporations couldn’t give directly to political campaigns. And everyone is up in arms because they don’t like it. The Federal Election Commission can’t do anything about it. They want the IRS to fix the problem.”

• Who exactly wanted you to “fix the problem” caused by Citizens United?

[Slide 2] In February 2011, you e-mailed your colleagues in the IRS: “Tea Party Matter very dangerous. This could be the vehicle to go to court on the issue of whether Citizens United overturning the ban on corporate spending applies to tax-exempt rules. Counsel and Judy Kindell need to be in on this one please. Cincy should probably NOT have these cases.”

• Why did you think the Tea Party cases were “very dangerous”?

[Slide 3] In September 2010, you e-mailed your subordinates about initiating a “c4 project,” but wrote: “we need to be cautious so it isn’t a per se political project.”

• Why were you worried about this being perceived as a political project?

[Slide 4] Michael Seto, manager of EO Technical in Washington, testified that you ordered Tea Party cases to undergo a “multi-tier review.” He testified: “She sent me email saying that when these cases need to go through multi-tier review and they will eventually have to go to Miss Kindell and the chief counsel’s office.”

• Why did you order the Tea Party cases to undergo a “multi-tier review”?

[Slide 5] In June 2011, you requested that Holly Paz obtain a copy of the tax-exempt application filed by Crossroads GPS so that your senior technical advisor, Judy Kindell, could review it and summarize the issues for you.

• Why did you want to have the Crossroads GPS application?

[Slide 6] In June 2012, you were part of an e-mail exchange that appeared to be about writing new regulations on political speech for 501(c)(4) groups “off-plan” in 2013.

• What does “off-plan” mean?

[Slide 7] In February 2014, President Obama stated that there was not a “smidgeon of corruption” in the IRS targeting.

• Ms. Lerner, do you believe that there is not a smidgeon of corruption in the IRS targeting of conservatives? [Slide 8] On Saturday, our Committee’s General Counsel sent an e-mail to your lawyer stating:

“I understand … that Ms. Lerner is willing [to] testify, and she is requesting a one week delay. In talking to the Chairman, wanted to make sure we had this right.”

Your lawyer gave a one word e-mail response: “yes.”

Are you still seeking this discussed delay?

Lerner refused to answer the questions. And instead invoked the 5th Amendment.

Recent Blog Posts

The Weekly Standard Archives

Browse 18 Years of the Weekly Standard

Old covers