A Circus of a Senate Race in Nevada
Can Republicans field a candidate who can beat Harry Reid?
12:25 PM, Jun 3, 2010 • By JOHN MCCORMACK
Harry Reid's favorability numbers are in the gutter, voters hate the new health care law, and Nevada has the highest foreclosure rate and the second highest unemployment rate of any state in the country. By all indications, the Senate majority leader's seat should be ripe for the picking.
But Republicans are worrying that they just might snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Though previous polls had shown onetime frontrunner Sue Lowden, a former news anchor, beauty queen, state senator, and state party chair, beating Reid by double digits, a Mason-Dixon poll last week showed the race had tightened to just 3 points. So, what's going on in Nevada?
"He’s trying to change the subject from his very unpopular health care bill," Lowden says in a phone interview. According to Lowden, bartering "is not a policy. It’s a fact that folks here in Nevada are bartering and that people did years ago do that. It’s just a fact." It's true that negotiating prices and paying cash can bring down costs, and it's true that some people in Nevada are bartering. But Lowden did initially endorse "that system" of bartering and has tied herself in knots explaining her comments.
Meanwhile, her opponent Sharron Angle, a former state assemblywoman, has surged to within just one point of Lowden in the Mason-Dixon poll, and 8 points ahead of Lowden in a new Suffolk poll (where Angle is also 7 points ahead of former UNLV basketball player and real estate business owner Danny Tarkanian). Angle, endorsed by the Tea Party Express and the Club for Growth, is admired by her supporters for her unvarnished conservatism. "Harry Reid has waterboarded our economy," she says.
Angle is "completely opposed" to all earmarks--no ifs, ands, or buts. Lowden and Tarkanian say they're against earmarks too, but have a more nuanced understanding of the definition an earmark. "Is the Boulder Dam an earmark?" Lowden asks. "All projects should be debated and thoroughly vetted" and voted on an "up or down vote," she says. Tarkanian says it's okay to direct dollars for things like "military spending in your state."
But Angle's straight-talking conservatism is cheered on not only by Tea Party activists; it's bringing a smile to Harry Reid's face, too. Angle polls a few points worse than Lowden and Tarkanian against Reid (she was losing by 3 points in that Mason-Dixon poll), and Democrats see her as too conservative to win. On Social Security and Medicare, for example, although Angle thinks seniors should be guaranteed "that safety net that they paid into," she would eventually like to completely do away with both programs. That's well beyond what Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin's "Road Map" has called for--a voucherized, means-tested, free-market Medicare (an idea Lowden supports exploring). "I don't believe that government should have any hand in our health care or our retirement," says Angle. She adds: "I’m not certain exactly over what period of time we phase that in, nor at which age level we say to them, 'You have to go onto the private system.'"