The Blog

Morning Jay: Special “Gallup Versus The World?” Edition

6:30 AM, Oct 19, 2010 • By JAY COST
Widget tooltip
Single Page Print Larger Text Smaller Text Alerts

Another week, another outlying Gallup generic ballot result.  Gallup finds the Republicans with either an 11- or 17-point lead, depending upon the likely voter screen.  Compare that to a Republican advantage of a little under 7 points in the RealClearPolitics average.

Morning Jay: Special “Gallup Versus The World?” Edition

What is going on here?  I think there are two factors at play.

First.  As Mark Blumenthal points out, the traditional Gallup likely voter model imposes a relatively tight screen on who gets included as a likely voter and who doesn’t.  Imagine a sinking ship with 100 passengers on it, and one lifeboat that will take 40 people.  Who gets on?  If the passengers throw out the old "women and children first!" maxim, and a mad scramble ensues, the answer is: the most industrious and committed!  That’s basically Gallup’s “traditional” model.  It assumes a 40% turnout rate of the voting age population, and includes the 40% of adults who appear to be the most committed to voting.  The higher turnout model sets the cap at 55%.

What to make of this?  Gallup has history on its side when it caps turnout at 40% of the voting age population.  According to Walter Dean Burnham (and when it comes to electoral statistics, there is no higher authority), turnout in the midterms since the ratification of the 26th Amendment has been amazingly consistent:

Michael McDonald at George Washington University has compiled slightly different turnout results, which tend to show lower numbers than Burnham's, but they are basically the same.

Why isn’t it an open-and-shut case vis-à-vis turnout?  Cap it at 40% and call it a day.  What’s wrong with that? 

The chief problem is that, unlike our lifeboat metaphor, turnout could go above 40%.  And just because it hasn’t happened in 35 years does not mean that it will not. 

I’d say there are some good reasons to expect a greater-than-average turnout this cycle.  Note that in the last three midterms, we’ve seen a steady increase in turnout, so another increase this cycle would follow the recent trend.  But more than this, we already know there is an amped up Republican base that is going to turn out a higher than normal rate.  Meanwhile, the Democrats remain a big question mark.  If they turn out at a correspondingly lower-than-normal rate, we should not see any change in turnout.  But if the Democratic decline is less than the Republican increase, then we will see an increase in turnout. 

Time will tell, and my guess is that Gallup and the other polls will converge at some point before Election Day, though it remains to be seen which side will do most of the movement.  

This actually underscores the importance of keeping an eye on the party spreads in the polling data.  Gallup’s traditional model might be overestimating Republican turnout, but I think many statewide polls (and some national ones) are underestimating it. In particular, it is appropriate to be cautious of polls that mimic the 2008 party spreads in any state (or, for that matter, nationwide). That was a year for which Republican turnout was low and Democratic turnout was high.  We are probably not going to see that this year.

Recent Blog Posts

The Weekly Standard Archives

Browse 19 Years of the Weekly Standard

Old covers