The BlogRasmussen: Voters Oppose "Morning-After Pill" Mandate 50% to 38%3:06 PM, Feb 22, 2012
• By JOHN MCCORMACK
Note that voters were not asked specifically whether religious institutions should be required to pay for these "morning-after pills" but whether insurers should generally pay for them. Opposition would likely be even higher if voters had been informed that Obamacare also mandates that a "week-after" pill that can cause abortions be offered "free of charge." The Weekly Standard ArchivesBrowse 15 Years of the Weekly Standard
|