The Senate's Doctors Speak Out Against Obamacare
8:30 AM, Oct 26, 2010 • By JEFFREY H. ANDERSON
Seven months after Obamacare's passage, the Senate's two doctors have conducted a “check-up” on the highly unpopular health care overhaul, the passage of which is about to cost the Democrats their nearly 80-seat advantage in the House and possibly even their 18-seat advantage in the Senate (where two more doctors, Rand Paul (R., Ky.), M.D., and John Boozman (R., Ark.), O.D., will likely be among the GOP newcomers).
As doctors Tom Coburn (R., Okla.) and John Barrasso (R., Wyo.) show in their report, entitled “Grim Diagnosis,” Obamacare wouldn’t reform our health care system but would deform it — by injecting the federal government into the middle of the private relationship between doctor and patient. Moreover, as Drs. Coburn and Barrasso write, Obamacare would increase “costs to patients, consumers, and taxpayers, while exacerbating many existing problems in health care.”
Their “check-up” shows how Obamacare would undermine existing health plans, medical innovation, fiscal solvency, and jobs; while centralizing power, politicizing health care, and reducing Americans' liberty. Here are a few highlights from the 26-page publication:
On Obamacare's effects on existing health plans, Drs. Coburn and Barrasso write,
On medical innovation, they write that in June,
On fiscal solvency, Coburn and Barrasso observe that, in August, the Obama administration issued a shamelessly politicized Medicare trustees’ report, which claimed that each of the hundreds of billions of dollars that Obamacare would siphon out of Medicare could simultaneously be spent (on Obamacare) and saved (so as to be spent later to extend the life of Medicare).
Coburn and Barrasso write that, in response to this brazen claim, “The official Chief Actuary of Medicare warned that ‘the financial projections shown in [the trustees’] report for Medicare do not represent a reasonable expectation for actual program operations in either the short range...or the long range.’” Thus, they note, the chief actuary issued a competing analysis “based on ‘more sustainable assumptions.’” That analysis showed that a dollar, indeed, cannot be spent twice.
On jobs, Drs. Coburn and Barrasso write that, in August, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued a report projecting that such provisions such as the (in the CBO's words) “substantial expansion of Medicaid,” and its extremely high effective marginal tax rates would, as the CBO writes, “discourage work.” Moreover, penalties on employers, the CBO says, “will probably cause some employers to respond by hiring fewer low-wage workers.”
Weighing the evidence, the CBO concludes, Obamacare “will affect some individuals’ decisions about whether and how much to work and employers’ decisions about hiring workers,” which, “on net, will reduce the amount of labor used in the economy” by “roughly half a percent.” Coburn and Barrasso write that the CBO's projections amount to over 788,000 employees — “a huge number of future jobs and future workers that will be effectively sidelined” by Obamacare.
Recent Blog Posts