Sex and Love at Yale
8:35 AM, Feb 11, 2012 • By THERESA CIVANTOS
New Haven, Conn.
The room was filled with other students, too, far more than the classroom’s 60 seats could hold. Many were there to protest Esolen’s presence on campus. Although his lecture that night was on the topic of “The Person as a Gift,” his published writings include arguments against gay marriage. Before his talk, an email had gone out to some of Yale’s more liberal student groups:
“Aside from the sheer creepiness of the talk’s title, Mr. Esolen is also a giant homophobe. . . . So what are we gonna do about it? How about a kiss in? Find a partner, a friend, a stranger who consents—anyone you feel comfortable sharing a smooch with (whether or not there's tongue is entirely up to you and your partner/s).”
The students filling the back of the room exchanged glances and suppressed giggles. “I would say five people are actually here for this,” one girl standing in the back muttered.
The UBYC students were not oblivious to the controversy. Bijan Aboutorabi, the group’s co-president, introduced Esolen with a request for his audience to show tolerance, even for one with whom they might “substantially and passionately disagree.” He might have saved his breath. Less than ten minutes into the lecture, a cell phone started playing Diana Ross’s “I’m Coming Out” and pairs of students stood up and began kissing on cue.
“Do you want to do this?” one girl said, giving the girl next to her a wary glance. They remained in place as the protestors left the room chanting “One in four, maybe more,”—a slogan at Yale that refers to the alleged statistic that some 25 percent of male students are homosexual.
“I kind of want to stay for the rest of the talk,” one of the girls said. “I feel like I owe him that.” The girls sat together, holding hands, for the rest of Esolen’s lecture, while almost every other protestor filed out.
Yale’s kiss-in protest and the clash between Sex Week and True Love Week are indicative of a larger ideological struggle going on at many colleges and universities as students seek to build healthy relationships in an environment that gives them virtually no guidelines for how to do so.
There is, on the one hand, the “openness” of the predominant sexual climate. Courtney Peters, executive director of Sex Week 2012, says the event is about education and openness—“not about bringing rampant sex to Yale.”
“We’re not here to throw condoms into a screaming crowd of underwear-clad undergraduates,” she said. “Sex Week was never about being rebellious. It was never about creating a culture of salacious voyeurism.”
What Sex Week is about, she said, is “creating dialogue,” through some 50 events during the ten days leading up to Valentine’s Day.
“Students who want to talk about sexuality and sexual health should not be made to feel like deviants,” Peters said. “This is going to sound very grandmotherly, but it needn’t be as big of a problem as it is.”
On the other end of the spectrum, the Undergraduates for a Better Yale College doubt that events like Sex Week are really for their benefit.
Isabel Marin is a senior who helped organize the events of True Love Week. The events of Sex Week, she said, are “not giving students any guidance or helping the climate improve.” Instead, “they’re simply going with the status quo.”
“Sex Week events continue to support the hookup culture or give the choice to support the hookup culture,” said Marin. “Giving the individual unlimited choice and no guidance is what is leading to rape on campus and other forms of sexual misconduct and disrespecting women.”
True Love Week, by contrast, offers a radically different message. “The only thing that is really going to change" the culture, Marin said, “is to convince Yale students that the healthiest, happiest romantic lives take place in the context of stable, chaste relationships.”
The problem of sexual victimization is what the organizers of both Sex Week and True Love Week say they are trying to fight. But the two sides radically disagree on how to do so.