|
 "Everybody has a right to sue."11:44 AM, Jul 2, 2010 • By MARY KATHARINE HAMAfter the Supreme Court affirmed this week in McDonald v. Chicago that Second-Amendment rights for individuals do indeed apply even within a 25-mile radius of organic grocers and a liberal city council, Chicago Mayor Richard Daley went to work to subvert his constituents' newfound right to self defense.
The measure, which draws from ordinances around the country, would ban gun shops in Chicago and prohibit gun owners from stepping outside their homes, even onto their porches or garages, with a handgun.
Daley announced his ordinance at a park on the city's South Side three days after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Americans have a right to own a gun for self-defense anywhere they live. The City Council is expected to vote on it Friday.
Daley goes on to explain how successful banning guns has been up until now:
"As long as I'm mayor, we will never give up or give in to gun violence that continues to threaten every part of our nation, including Chicago," said Daley, who was flanked by activists...
Those who already have handguns in the city — which has been illegal since the city's ban was approved 28 years ago — would have 90 days to register those weapons, according to the proposed ordinance
Last weekend in the allegedly gun-free paradise of Chicago? 54 shot, 10 dead in gun violence.
Daley was unable to include in the bill a requirement that citizens insure their guns or restrict each gunowner to only one gun, for fear of legal challenges, but added "everyone has a right to sue." Wel, it's nice he recognizes that right.
The absurd battle to use terror to further the anti-Second Amendment agenda. 1:49 PM, May 7, 2010 • By DANIEL HALPER
Mayor Mike is coming for your guns, but not even this administration -- and this Congress -- is naive enough to play along. Bloomberg appealed to Congress this week to address what is oddly being called the "terror gap," but which supporters of Second Amendment rights better describe as "secret government lists." The question is this: Should U.S. citizens on terror watch lists be allowed to purchase firearms? The answer from Congress is yes (though the Huffington Post and the New York Times would have you believe it's just Republicans obstructing Bloomberg's "common sense" proposal).
Read more... Nowhere is perfectly safe--give the kids a fighting chance.12:00 AM, May 5, 2010 • By C.J. CIARAMELLA
A little more than three years ago, Seung-Hui Cho entered a building at Virginia Tech, chained the doors shut and began shooting. He killed 32 people--the deadliest school shooting in United States history. The tragedy sparked a nationwide review of campus safety measures. Colleges began coordinating with local police to update old and outdated emergency policies. But the shooting also caused many students, dismayed by the poor emergency response by Virginia Tech administrators and police, to start looking toward ensuring their own safety. A movement was born to roll back long-standing handgun bans at colleges, led by the group Students for Concealed Carry on Campus.
Read more... 10:40 AM, Apr 28, 2010 • By MARY KATHARINE HAMGov. Rick Perry carries a pistol when he does trail runs in places where there are predators. On this particular sunrise run, a coyote was coming after his dog. I'll just reproduce the quotes, which make me wish I lived in Texas, where this is just plain talk from a politician:
"Don't attack my dog or you might get shot ... if you're a coyote,"
"They're very wily creatures."
Read more... Real America. 12:55 PM, Apr 26, 2010 • By DANIEL HALPER
There is one sector of the economy that seems to be thriving in these hard times -- the gun industry. At least, that's the impression I got from a Sunday morning ride down to the Nation's Gun Show in Chantilly, Virginia.
With T-shirts emblazoned with provocative logos -- "I'm still clinging to my guns" -- it's pretty clear that the industry's success rides on the coattails of the president, who is largely seen as being against guns and for greater government control. But other than those few T-shirts, and stickers claiming, "Guns Save Lives," it was a surprisingly apolitical affair.
Read more... 9:55 AM, Mar 31, 2010 • By C.J. CIARAMELLA
A federal judge last Friday upheld the District of Columbia's handgun regulations, finding them within Constitutional bounds and declaring public safety to be a compelling governmental interest. From the Washington Post:
U.S. District Judge Ricardo M. Urbina found that the new regulations were crafted to make the streets safer and aren't so restrictive that they violate the Second Amendment guarantee of a person's right to own a gun for self-defense.
Read more... The Second Amendment and the privileges or immunities clause.5:30 PM, Mar 4, 2010 • By ADAM J. WHITETwo years ago, the Supreme Court heard the hotly controversial Heller case, in which it ultimately recognized a personal right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment. That case, which pertained only to federal (and District of Columbia) gun regulations, not state or other local gun regulations, sharply divided activists along partisan lines.
The Court is now considering McDonald v. City of Chicago, a follow-up case asking whether persons have an equivalent right against state and local governments. The familiar partisan divide has returned, but this time the more heated divide separates dueling factions on the right. Even more surprising is the subject of the debate: A 137-year-old line of Supreme Court precedent involving the Fourteenth Amendment.
Read more... 11:50 AM, Mar 3, 2010 • By C.J. CIARAMELLA
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday in McDonald v. Chicago -- the case challenging Chicago's handgun ban. Judging from the transcripts, it looks like a majority of justices favor applying the Second Amendment to the states. SCOTUSblog has an extended analysis of the day's proceedings:
Read more... "I just got the feeling that I'm on my own."9:50 AM, Mar 2, 2010 • By MARY KATHARINE HAMHe's perhaps an unlikely plaintiff in a challenge to Chicago's hand gun ban before the Supreme Court this week, but the 76-year-old South Side Democrat says his right to defend himself isn't about party.
"I live and think like a human being, concerned for others as I am myself," he told Fox News.
Read more...
‹‹ More Recent
Earlier ››
|
- Conservative Intelligence
- Satirical Wit
- Foreign Policy Insight
- Sophisticated Perspective
Ethan Epstien, in a New York System state of mind
Read more...
-
-
Washington plays by TSA rules.
-
Reflections from the thinking man’s knuckleballer.
-
Really?
-
A film without pretension about warriors as heroes.
-
With American evangelicals on the ground in South Sudan.
-
-
Romney’s challenge is to address the deep uneasiness in America and point the way to a comeback.
-
The American and his/her car.
-
   Obama’s overblown tax breaks
for business.
 Why we need to break up the banks.
 Why we build memorials.
|