Eight days after a meeting on a potential free trade agreement between the United States and the European Union last month, two congressmen introduced a bill to influence the process and help prevent economic discrimination against Israel. Called the “U.S.-Israel Trade and Commercial Enhancement Act” the bill is an effort to counter the Boycott, Divest and Sanctions Movement (BDS), which is lamentably popular in Europe.
The bill’s primary sponsors, Illinois’s Peter Roskam, a Republican, and California’s Juan Vargas, a Democrat, proposed the legislation as a “targeted approach” to counter BDS activity where most of it occurs – the EU. So far, 24 congressmen have co-sponsored the legislation.
After having conversations with Israeli companies and business leaders, Roskam became concerned that BDS activity could seriously affect Israel’s economy. As such, the bill would require the president to submit a report to Congress within six months after enactment, and annually thereafter. The report would require the administration to present “specific steps being taken by the United States to encourage foreign countries and international organizations to cease creating such barriers and to dismantle measures already in place.” According to Roskam’s office, as per congressionally mandated reporting requirements, it would be at the discretion of the administration to determine what constitutes companies being encouraged to join the boycott. Any boycott activity by an EU company that is part of the US stock exchanges would have to be reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
If the bill passes, some expect it to exacerbate trade tensions between the U.S. and EU -- which is sort of its point. Larry Solomon, a Financial Post columnist, said in an email, “This bill is making the anti-Israel crowd apoplectic and for good reason -- it will help expose their funding. Although the BDS movement portrays itself as grass-roots, in fact it is largely funded by EU institutions. If this bill passes and succeeds in erecting a wall between EU funding institutions and the BDS NGOs, the BDS movement would soon be starved of funds and dissipate.”
The BDS movement does not only affect the geopolitical arena, it’s also the source of battles fought daily on college campuses across America. Daniel Mael, a Brandeis University student and pro-Israel activist, said in an email, "As thousands of college students battle BDS on college campuses it [is] reassuring to see members of Congress make a similar effort. One must recognize that everyone wins if the BDS movement is thwarted… The goal in the long-run should be to not only outlast BDS, but to continue to promote Israel's case in an unwavering fashion despite the legions of activists seeking its ultimate destruction.”
Adam Reuter, the chairman of two Israeli financial companies, says, “It is especially important that the U.S. will help us versus European institutions … some of them are threatening us with all kinds of academic and economic boycotts. These kind of intentions are definitely hurting relationships between Israel and Europe.” According to Reuter, the continued existence of BDS in the EU is the fault of European institutions, not just anti-Israel agitators. Reuter also observes that Israel imports more from Europe than it exports to the continent.
Though known as an economic protest, BDS also has psychological propaganda. Human Rights attorney and Lawfare Project director Brooke Goldstein said BDS is a “modern form of Jew-hatred and should be addressed by legislation,” though the next step would be to concentrate on domestic boycotts of Israel. Pro-Israel activist Chloe Valdary said that, as of today “BDS is much more of an ideological, symbolic weapon than an economic one… Such weapons have the potential to affect public policy if anti-Israel sentiment becomes trendy and acceptable in the popular sphere. If it does, the voting public can put pressure on lawmakers to actualize a symbolic sanction of Israel via legislation.”
In this economic and psychological battle, this bill has the potential to better impact trade relations between the U.S. and the EU.
Jackson Richman is an intern at The Weekly Standard.
Former Texas governor Rick Perry is taking on Russian president Vladimir Putin. The possible presidential candidate says that the "peace and security of the world" depends on how America deals with Russia.
Here's what Perry recommends doing to counter Putin's recent aggression:
Vice President Biden spent about a day and a half in Belgium in early February to meet with various European leaders, but his entourage, security team and other delegation members required up to 209 rooms for up to three weeks surrounding the visit.
Vice President Joe Biden is in Europe today where how spoke out against Vladimir Putin's aggression toward Ukraine.
"Ukraine is fighting for its very survival right now. Russia continues to escalate the conflict by sending mercenaries and tanks and as we euphemistically say in the United States, Little Green Men, without patches in, and very sophisticated special operation soldiers," Biden said at the European Council building in Brussels.
In Athens in mid-January, two weeks before the election that would make 40-year-old engineer Alexis Tsipras Greece’s new prime minister, a bunch of cleaning ladies explained to me why they planned to vote for his party, the Coalition of the Radical Left (Syriza, for its Greek acronym). We met where they had lived, at least part of the time, for the past 16 months: among tents on the sidewalk in front of the economics ministry in downtown Athens.
The European Parliament has called for the dismemberment of Google, the French want “les Gafa,” as they call Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon, reined in, EU regulators are under pressure to get tough with the Americans. And the leaders of Silicon Valley’s non-tax-paying, privacy-invading, dominant tech firms, to use EU descriptives, are surprised. They shouldn’t be.
Only 12 years ago, the Republic of Turkey was correctly seen as the model of a pro-Western Muslim state, and a bridge between Europe and the Middle East. A strong military bond with the Pentagon undergirded broader economic and cultural ties with Americans. And then, starting with the 2002 elections that brought the Justice and Development party (AKP) and Recep Tayyip Erdogan, first as prime minister and now as president, to power, Turkey dramatically changed course.
When it comes to military actions, President Obama likes to declare the end of wars, regardless of whether America’s opponents agree that is the case. When it comes to economic wars, he has no need to declare an end, no need for unilateral disarmament, because he never engages in the first place. Indeed, he does all he can to make our adversaries’ task easier by spiking any guns we might have before they can be fired by Congress, his trade union friends, or other aggrieved parties.
In the late 17th century, times were tough in Scotland. The Stuarts, the Scots’ royal family, had been tossed off the throne of England for a second time, and the country had been excluded from the burgeoning English system of international trade regulated by the Navigation Acts. Even the climate was more miserable than usual: these were the worst years of northern Europe’s “little ice age.”
This week’s referendum on Scottish independence may seem like an obscure, perhaps even Ruritanian quarrel to many Americans, but it has profound implications not just for the U.K. and Europe but also for the United States.
Vladimir Putin’s efforts to establish hegemony over Ukraine may now have reached a decisive point both for the balance of power in Central and Eastern Europe and for the NATO alliance. Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko warned on August 30 that Russia’s invasion of his country and extensive aid to pro-Moscow separatists could soon “reach the point of no return,” becoming a generalized conflict. German foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said that “the situation is increasingly getting out of control.”
In my quest to write an article about my family vacation to Turkey and thereby write off part of the cost, I came up with an observation I deemed worthy of David Brooks or Malcolm Gladwell. It turned out to be dead wrong.