Here we go again. JPMorgan Chase will pay $2.6 billion in fines and compensation for its inattention to numerous red flags warning that its important customer, one Bernie Madoff, was running a $65 billion Ponzi scheme. Among other things, JP Morgan Chase failed to notify the authorities that it had turned down one deal with Madoff because, as it had belatedly reported to its UK regulators, Madoff’s investment results were “so consistently and significantly ahead of its peers [that they] appear too good to be true.” This annoying fact, along with countless other red flags cited by the Justice Department—including a warning from another bank that stopped doing business with Madoff—was never reported to regulators, in violation of the Bank Secrecy Act.
Nevertheless, Jamie Dimon and his executive team at JPMorgan Chase have reason to be happy: no criminal indictments against them have been filed, and not one cent of the $20 billion in compensation and fines so far levied against the bank ($7 billion is “compensation” and therefore tax-deductible) will come out of their pockets. The Justice Department is happy: it has been tapping the bank’s treasury for billions in voter-pleasing, headline-making fines. The shareholders are happy: they have bid up the bank’s share by almost 30 percent in the past year.
With the bank’s executives, its shareholders, and the prosecutors all seeming to be happy, why worry? Here’s why. Systemic failure lurks. A spokesman for the bank confessed, “We could have done a better job pulling together various pieces of information and concerns about Madoff from different parts of the bank over time.” That is close to a confession that Paul Miller, a bank analyst at FBR Capital Markets, was right when he told Peter Eavis of the New York Times, “I think JPMorgan is too big to manage and it should be broken up.” So attention must be paid to Kurt Schacht, a director of a firm promoting ethical standards in the financial sector: “With respect to the big banks it is … a complexity problem. We think these firms are so large that they are always going to be plagued by rogue operations.”
This is not a problem for the shareholders alone, although they might be rethinking last year’s decision to allow Jamie Dimon to serve as CEO, reporting to Jamie Dimon, chairman of the board. If the nation’s largest bank is run by a managerial team of serial fine-payers, their next miscue might just threaten the stability of the banking system as a whole. After all, when it comes to size and interconnectedness with other financial institutions, Lehman Brothers is a disconnected pygmy by comparison with JPMorgan Chase, and the collapse of Lehman almost brought down the financial system in 2008.
Even if JPMorgan Chase proves to be manageable, perhaps by a new team, reasons to worry remain. It is true that steps have been taken since the financial crisis to reduce what is called systemic risk, the danger that a bank’s failure will not only wipe out its shareholders, but threaten the system as a whole. Banks must now hold more capital, and take fewer risks with depositors’ money. Legislation has been passed, regulations written and fines levied.
But no enforcement agency dares set fines so high as to threaten the ability of a bank to raise capital, and regulation is a limited instrument given the nature of banking.
Regulators in ever-larger numbers prowl the corridors of these institutions, hoping to sniff out problems before their stench panics investors, and trying to harpoon any new $6 billion “London whale” before it surfaces. Green-shaded government auditors check bookkeeping entries. All to the good, but not entirely sufficient. After all, if the managers of a bank such as JPMorgan Chase cannot connect the dots that would have led to earlier discovery of the Madoff fraud, how can government regulators be expected to do so? We are asking regulators to measure such ill-defined things as “risk,” understand complex financial instruments, decide just how much capital, and of what sort, a too-big-to-fail bank must have—subjects so difficult that in the words of Tevye in Fiddler on the Roof, “they would cross a Rabbi’s eyes.” And probably those of most members of bank boards.
Truth to tell, The Scrapbook has gotten as good a laugh as anyone out of the saga of John C. Beale, the retired Environmental Protection Agency official—Princeton grad, onetime deputy assistant administrator in the Office of Air and Radiation, congressionally certified expert on global warming—who has been sentenced to 32 months in prison for stealing nearly a million dollars from the federal government.
The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) reported last week that in 2011, the IRS paid out $3.6 billion in fraudulent refunds on tax returns filed by identity thieves. Even that amount was an improvement over the previous year when the total fraud was $5.2 billion. However, on Tuesday, TIGTA released a new report that found that though the IRS is making some progress against fraud, it is not using all available tools to prevent erroneous refunds and improper tax credits.
As the October 1 implementation of parts of Obamacare nears, House Republicans continue to pass legislation aimed at highlighting the health care law's flaws and weaknesses. On Thursday, the House passed a bill to reform an Obamacare verification process that would better stop fraudulent claims to health insurance subsidies. Politico reports:
The state of Alabama received bonus payments from Medicaid for 2009 and 2010 that were a stunning 13 times higher than the state was eligible for. So says the inspector general (IG) for Health and Human Services in a report released on Wednesday.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) released a report on Thursday regarding illegal trafficking in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), more commonly known as food stamps. The report showed that the rate of trafficking rose from 1 percent of total benefits in the last study period of 2006-2008 to 1.3 percent in the current study period of 2009-2011, an increase of 30 percent. The report noted the trafficking rate remains well below a rate of almost 4 percent that existed for much of the 1990s. The rate plunged to 1 percent by the 2002-2005 study period and remained there until the current report:
Despite an admission by the Department of Transportation (DOT) that the Federal-aid Highway Programs under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) are "susceptible to significant improper payments," the DOT Inspector General (IG) has terminated an audit initiated in April "due to other higher priority work demands."
Congressional hearings over the last two weeks have been filled with stories of misconduct due to incompetence and inexperience among certain IRS employees. Both Republicans and Democrats have leveled the accusations, and Internal Revenue officials testifying before Congress have admitted as much. At the same time, all parties have stressed that the vast majority of IRS employees are hard working, competent, and honest civil servants.
Here's a photo of an election judge checking in voters in Barack Obama's Chicago ward--wearing an Obama baseball cap:
"This photo, taken by a voter this morning at the Ward 4, Precinct 37 polling place (1212 South Plymouth Court, Chicago), shows an election judge checking in voters while wearing an Obama hat," a source writes. "Chicago's 4th ward is home to President Barack Obama."
Urban Outfitters, a retail store that appeals to a young (teens and 20s) demographic, is encouraging voters to "Vote Early, Vote Often." A reader, Allyson Rowen Taylor, sends along this picture from the storefront of the Urban Outfitters at the corner of Laurel Canyon and Ventura Blvd. in Studio City, California: