Drama critics come in all kinds, besides, of course, good and bad. There are those who regurgitate the plot and those who gallop off on hobby-horses. There are those with sound ideas but no style; those with impressive styles but no taste. Some tergiversate, even without a Janus face; others ride one point into the ground. Then there are the really good ones, like Britain’s Benedict Nightingale, whose song should be heard far beyond Berkeley Square.
And so it pointedly can be with this collection of new critical pieces, some of which are based on past reviews but go further and deeper than the contemporaneous notices I pleasurably read in the New York Times on Sundays during his all-too-brief incumbency from 1983-84. Stimulating they were, like his longtime reviews in the Times of London—and often also in the New Statesman, the Guardian, and elsewhere. Enjoyable, too, was his memoir of Sunday-critic life in New York, Fifth Row Center: A Critic’s Year On and Off Broadway (1986), but it is this broader and deeper new book that confirms his status as one of the best in a pullulating field.
The 103 little essays, each one centering on an important opening night, constitute a panorama that extends from The Oresteia of Aeschylus (458 b.c.) to Jez Butterworth’s Jerusalem (2009 a.d.)—covering works and productions of just about every significant Anglophone dramatist, as well as those of a good many Europeans. The title’s “great moments” are a trifle misleading: These remarkable, compact pieces do not view “moments” as literal minute incidents, but as momentous events and achievements of lasting importance.
And not, usually, of single plays only. Generally, these moments lead to mature and incisive discussions of entire oeuvres and careers, little--known but piquant production details, spectacular or disastrous performances, backstage scandals and existential vicissitudes, gifted directors, stupid censors, and perceptive as well as comically inept critics. All this bolstered by fascinating behind-the-scenes tidbits, wildly comic anecdotes, bizarre audience responses, and artistic, historic, and philosophical speculations that provide supplementary insights in wonderfully rounded, highly literate prose.
Not being 2,000-plus years old or geographically ubiquitous, Nightingale relies for early or distant opening nights on written accounts by others; but he manages to boil down exhaustive readings into vivid pages as pregnant and lively as firsthand reports. These can involve such instances as the 1849 war between England’s starry actor William Macready and America’s equally stellar Edwin Forrest. (The former was pelted in Philadelphia with rotten eggs and in Cincinnati with half a sheep, and the two of them performed rival Macbeths in nearby Manhattan theaters, eliciting 20,000 stone-throwing rioters, up to 30 corpses, and many wounded.) Or they transport us to 1868 in Moscow, where Anton Chekhov’s The Seagull tremblingly opens after a hissed fiasco in St. Petersburg that had the author escaping “with his overcoat collar hiding his face” and his health worsened.
But things really get rolling when we reach Nightingale’s personal involvement as spectator or reviewer, where, in two pages, he can leave us totally immersed, entertained, and enriched, whether we are dedicated theatergoers or merely interested readers.
Though these pieces are mostly laudatory, the author can be very funny in occasional mockery. Take the item about a show called Twang!!, in which he allows that picking the worst musical is tricky because of intense competition. He evokes the terrible Marilyn, with its chorus of purple-clad plumbers feting Monroe in her bubble bath. Or Fields of Ambrosia, with “a chorus of Southern belles celebrating the death of a young man strapped into an electric chair behind them.” He wonders: “Did I really hear a sadistic prison warden sing ‘Your ass is too good to fry’ before assaulting a German murderess called Gretchen,” or herself sing as she “prowled in her cage on Death Row . . . ‘Do it, boy, fry me while I’m hot’?”
There are more, similar recollections, as Nightingale always provides pungent peripheral stuff before he gets to his main subject, here Twang!!, an absurd Robin Hood story about whose ludicrous rehearsals Nightingale is hilarious, ending with citing its “number in which medieval beauties begged for a locksmith to undo their chastity belts.”
But how neat is this, about Mother Courage and Her Children and Bertolt Brecht’s undependable alienation effect?