|
8:32 AM, May 9, 2013 • By GEOFFREY NORMANThe Pentagon has been on a long and expensive quest to make its personnel invisible. Or something close to it. So new camouflage patterns have been researched. Several of them, in fact. At least one for every branch of the service, including the Air Force, most of whose people do not need to hide from anyone. Still, as David A. Fahrenthold writes in the Washington Post:
... the Air Force still spent $3.1 million to come up with its own ground combat uniform. It was a "tiger-stripe" pattern, a throwback to camouflage used in Vietnam.
But it was not well-suited to Afghanistan.
“They were not designed to hide anybody. They were designed to look cool,” said [Timothy] O’Neill, the West Point camouflage expert, giving his outside appraisal of the Air Force design. “It’s what we call ‘CDI Factor.’ Which is, ‘Chicks dig it.’ ”
Finally, in 2010, the Air Force ordered its personnel in Afghanistan to ditch the Airman Battle Uniform and wear Army camouflage instead. “The [Army pattern] provides the higher level of protection and functionality our airmen need,” an Air Force spokeswoman said this week.
There is much more to the camouflage wars that resulted in the spending of millions to design several different patterns, some of which don't work while others are held onto with propriety tenacity by the service that designed them because they don't want to share.
The story is about more than camouflage. It is a tale of how Washington shamelessly wastes taxpayer money. A new telling, then, of an old, old tale.
12:08 PM, May 6, 2013 • By STEPHEN F. HAYESA top U.S. diplomat will testify Wednesday that as fighting raged in Benghazi, Libya, in the early morning hours of September 12, 2012, military officials in the region told a second rescue team preparing to deploy from Tripoli to Benghazi not to make the trip.
Read more... 2:10 PM, Apr 30, 2013 • By OTTO J. REICHThe reaction of most Americans to the tragedy in Boston was typical: We came together as a nation, mourned our fallen, and applauded our newest heroes. The sight of first-responders running to the sound of danger within mere seconds of the explosions, not away from disaster as human instinct might dictate, was nothing short of exceptional—but also characteristically American. Indeed, for 237 years, Americans have risked all to help their fellow citizens, strangers, and foreigners equally.
Read more... Last Army tank leaves Germany.3:32 PM, Apr 6, 2013 • By GEOFFREY NORMANSince the Shermans of General Patton's Third Army crossed the Rhine on March 22, 1945, there have been American tanks in Germany. No more, as John Vandiver of Stars and Stripes reports.
Read more... 2:54 PM, Apr 3, 2013 • By THOMAS DONNELLYDefense Secretary Chuck Hagel’s address to the National Defense University today, hyped by the administration as a “strong message that the time has come for [the Department of Defense] to consider fundamental change in how it is organized and how it operates to better reflect 21st century strategic and fiscal realities” turned out to be a bit of a wet noodle.
Read more... 11:37 AM, Mar 13, 2013 • By DANIEL HALPEREric Edelman, Robert Kagan, William Kristol, and Dan Senor, all board members of the Foreign Policy Initiative, released the following statement this morning:
Read more... Over women in combat.Mar 18, 2013, Vol. 18, No. 26 • By JOHN MCCORMACKWhen news broke that the Obama administration was lifting the rule excluding women from combat units, the rare sound of bipartisan applause reverberated on Capitol Hill. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, one of two conservative women in the Senate, said she was “pleased” with the change, issued in late January: “I’ve seen firsthand servicemen and women working together in a range of dangerous operations to achieve our military objectives—and today’s announcement reflects the increasing role that female service members play in securing our country.”
Read more... Over women in combat.Mar 18, 2013, Vol. 18, No. 26 • By JOHN MCCORMACKWhen news broke that the Obama administration was lifting the rule excluding women from combat units, the rare sound of bipartisan applause reverberated on Capitol Hill. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, one of two conservative women in the Senate, said she was “pleased” with the change, issued in late January: “I’ve seen firsthand servicemen and women working together in a range of dangerous operations to achieve our military objectives—and today’s announcement reflects the increasing role that female service members play in securing our country.”
Read more... 10:33 AM, Mar 5, 2013 • By DANIEL HALPERStephen D. Abney, the chief public affairs official for the Army’s Joint Munitions Command, recently sent a message to all 6,000 employees he speaks for: Don’t criticize President Barack Obama or any political party to members of the press. The message was received by civilian contractors as well.
Read more... 2:30 PM, Feb 8, 2013 • By GEOFFREY NORMANIt can be tempting, if you are not a Washington insider or intimate, to put the Chuck Hagel business out of mind. Or try, anyway.
Read more... 1:48 PM, Feb 8, 2013 • By MICHAEL WARRENThe planned cuts to the defense budget as a result of the sequestration could mean reductions in benefits fo active members of the military and their families. Adam Kredo reports:
Read more... 8:55 AM, Feb 8, 2013 • By CHRISTOPHER HARMERAmerica’s military presence in the Persian Gulf serves as deterrence to Iran, reassures our increasingly nervous Arab partners, maintains peace, offers stability to our ally Israel, and has many other benefits.
Read more...
|
|