A worthless initiative in Florida.
4:08 PM, Aug 25, 2014 • By ETHAN EPSTEIN
Florida Polytechnic “University” (it isn’t accredited) is making headlines this week by opening a bookless library. Instead of checking out traditional codex books, students will be forced to read class material on tablets, e-readers, and/or laptops. According to the middle-aged librarians and bureaucrats who run the school, a bookless library will appeal to the youth. Abandoning books will make the library more "relevant" to students, they say. Never mind that Pew has found that millennials are less likely to favor e-readers over traditional books than members of older generations.
Librarians eschewing books to cluelessly appeal to “the kidz” is reminiscent of nothing so much as aging fuddy-duddy fathers who try to appeal to their kids by speaking in already outdated hip-hop slang.
FPU's head librarian Kathryn Miller tells Reuters that, "it's a boldly relevant decision to go forward without books.” "Boldly relevant" is of course a bizarre standard to apply, insofar as it has no normative content. Sure, the decision is "relevant," arguably. But more important: Is it wise? Is it prudent? Will it serve the students?
The evidence suggests that it won't. Two recent studies have found that electronic readers are in fact inferior to traditional books in many ways – particularly when it comes to retaining information. As Scientific American reports, "Evidence...indicates that modern screens and e-readers fail to adequately recreate certain tactile experiences of reading on paper that...prevent people from navigating long texts in an intuitive and satisfying way...such navigational difficulties may subtly inhibit reading comprehension. Compared with paper, screens may also drain more of our mental resources while we are reading and make it a little harder to remember what we read when we are done."
And so FPU's attempt at "relevance" may result in producing nothing but a more poorly educated, distracted group of students. With librarians like the ones at Florida Polytechnic University, who needs Philistines?
3:38 PM, Jun 19, 2013 • By ETHAN EPSTEIN
President Obama told a German audience today that the U.S. lags behind other countries because Americans don't speak enough foreign languages. It’s not the first time he’s expressed the sentiment: back in 2008, Obama said, “It's embarrassing when Europeans come over here, they all speak English, they speak French, they speak German. And then we go over to Europe and all we can say is merci beaucoup, right?"
3:02 PM, Jun 19, 2013 • By DANIEL HALPER
At an event in Germany, President Obama said American youth lag behind their European counterparts because they are not taught "a second and third language." Via the pool report:
POTUS opened his remarks with "Guten Abend."
The story behind the stories about Webster’s Third. Nov 12, 2012, Vol. 18, No. 09 • By JOSEPH EPSTEIN
Of the making of books, Ecclesiastes informs us, there is no end. But of some books, perhaps, there should never have been a beginning. One such book, or so many believed when it first appeared, was Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of the English Language, Unabridged.
Words to live by—at the moment.Oct 1, 2012, Vol. 18, No. 03 • By JAMES BOWMAN
‘Modern proverbs” is surely a contradiction in terms—unless “modern” is being used in its unmodern sense of “commonplace,” as in Shakespeare’s “wise saws and modern instances.” The word “proverb” inevitably connotes the idea of age and seasoning—wisdom that has been tried by time. Indeed, a proverb is usually so old that its original author is unknown.
Dividing the world into prescriptivists and descriptivists. Oct 1, 2012, Vol. 18, No. 03 • By DAVID SKINNER
The fifth edition of the American Heritage Dictionary, published by Houghton Mifflin, was released last fall. In the typecast world of dictionary publishing, American Heritage is the “conservative” dictionary. Developed in the 1960s in the wake of company president James Parton’s failed attempt to wrest control of the G. and C. Merriam Co., which had recently become notorious for the publication of the “permissive” dictionary, Webster’s Third, the first edition of the American Heritage Dictionary was deliberately marketed as the choice of squares and fogeys.
12:00 AM, Sep 20, 2012 • By JEFF BERGNER
There is an old saw that if you torture statistics enough, they will tell you whatever you want to hear. Words are like this, too. In the interest of clarity during the current campaign season, here is a brief lexicon of how Democratic officials use words:
This tongue has many colors.Aug 27, 2012, Vol. 17, No. 46 • By SARA LODGE
In the musical My Fair Lady, snooty dialectician Henry Higgins searches in vain for “purity” of expression in English; he winces at the Scots and the Irish, shudders at the Cockney London accent. His parting shot is, however, fired across the Atlantic: There even are places where English completely disappears, / In America they haven’t used it for years! sings the Englishman.
Who speaks for the English language? Feb 6, 2012, Vol. 17, No. 20 • By JACK LYNCH
In Gambit, Rex Stout’s 1962 mystery novel, the quirky and housebound detective Nero Wolfe sits before a fireplace on a too-small chair, “tearing sheets out of a book and burning them. The book is the new edition, the third edition, of Webster’s New International Dictionary, Unabridged.” Why? “He considers it subversive because it threatens the integrity of the English language.” Able to cite “a thousand examples of its crimes,” including using infer and imply interchangeably, the detective calls it “a deliberate attempt to murder” the language.
Philip Terzian, monolinguistOct 17, 2011, Vol. 17, No. 05 • By PHILIP TERZIAN
I was surprised the other day at lunch when someone asked me a question that, I suppose, must come with age: Had I any regrets in life?
1:18 PM, Aug 24, 2011 • By PHILIP TERZIAN
The apparent fall of the Qaddafi regime, and the likely capture (or killing) of the tyrant himself, will signal the end not only of four decades of internal repression and external terrorism, but one of the more vexing orthographic challenges in modern American journalism: the spelling of the colonel's surname.
‹‹ More Recent