The Wellstone Memorial, Revisited
The memorial service for Minnesota senator Paul Wellstone on October 29, 2002, is generally viewed in Washington--by both Democrats and Republicans--as the turning point in the last midterm elections. If there was any one moment that cost Democrats their Senate majority and prevented them from regaining the House, that was it.
Just four days after Wellstone was killed with his wife and several staffers in a plane crash on the campaign trail, Democratic activists gathered in the University of Minnesota's Williams Arena to pay their respects. The service was (very) long and (somewhat) varied. In the course of it, those assembled booed the non-Democratic politicians who came to pay their respects. Republicans were harangued from the stage to drop their partisan affiliation and rally behind Wellstone's program. Wellstone was treated less as an admirable man to be missed and mourned than as a convenient vehicle for advancing a partisan program. A significant portion of Americans found the spectacle repugnant.
In recent months, certain Democratic ideologues--perhaps chastened by their own role in their party's 2002 defeat--have urged a revisionist view of the Wellstone memorial. In this, they resemble the Buchananite Republicans of 1992 who spent years disputing the proposition that Pat Buchanan's "religious and cultural war" speech at the Houston convention cost the GOP at the polls that year. But the Wellstone revisionists go a step further. They seek to convince the American public that it didn't see what it saw. According to them, Trent Lott was never booed by the crowd, ideology was a small part of the service, and the evening turned into a liability for Democrats only because the "right-wingers" who "control the media" distorted the facts for partisan gain.
Our own sense that this ghoulish leave-taking created problems for Democrats was formed more by talking to Democrats than by talking to Republicans. Certainly the media picked up the excesses in a way that caused problems for Democrats. But no rational Democrat believes those excesses were a Republican fabrication. It is thus gratifying to see in Tom Daschle's newly published memoir "Like No Other Time" (Crown Books, 304 pages, $25) that the Democrats closest to the spectacle at the time agree with us on the facts of the matter.
Take, for instance, the booing of Trent Lott. Moments after Lott told Daschle, "I'm here because Paul would have done the same for me," Lott went into the arena and was, in Daschle's words, "showered with boos and catcalls from the crowd. I felt very bad for Trent and Tricia. I think Paul Wellstone would have felt bad, too. He would not have abided the people responding that way--his people or anyone else's."
Daschle found similar sentiments among his fellow Democratic senators, returning to Washington on a private plane:
At one point, Chris [Dodd], [North Dakota Democrat] Byron [Dorgan] and I were sitting together, talking about how anyone who knew Paul or his politics would understand and appreciate how his spirit was reflected in that evening's enthusiasm. But we knew how many people did not know Paul and did not share his politics, and we agreed that among those people--millions of them across America--we were going to pay a price for what had just happened.
"We may just have lost the Minnesota Senate race," Chris said.
"That may not be all," Byron replied.
And Daschle heard the same from former vice president Walter Mondale, who replaced Wellstone as senatorial candidate:
I remember talking to Fritz Mondale in the afternoon the following day. He, too, was shocked at the rapid turn of events. He had already personally experienced the vitriol among many Minnesotans that morning.
And from Democratic pollsters and activists across the country:
Not only did Walter Mondale slip overnight from eight points up to ten points down. . . . In South Dakota, where [incumbent Democratic senator] Tim Johnson's people were going door-to-door all over the state, reports were coming back that more than a few South Dakotans were saying, "I am so outraged at what happened in Minnesota that I was going to vote for Tim, but now I'm going to vote Republican."
This was the Democrats' assessment of the Wellstone memorial before the "right wing" media had had a chance to "distort" it.
Call Him Wiggles
In a story in last week's Newsweek online about Iraqi reconstruction, there was a glancing mention of an important grassroots effort to reach out to Iraqi children. The article talks about safety improvements in parts of Baghdad: "There are motor pools, and Internet cafes, cafeterias and video lounges." And in an almost dismissive manner, it continues: "There's even a blog from inside the Green Zone, put out by someone who says he's a military intelligence soldier using the pseudonym Chief Wiggles (http://chiefwiggles.blog-city.com). Lately the boosterish Chief Wiggles has been using his blog to find donors to give him bicycles so soldiers can pedal around the zone giving out toys to children."
Boosterish? We understand the writer probably bears no malice towards the chief, but this operation is no ordinary "toys for tots" program. Wiggles's efforts to make life a little easier for the children of Iraq is on a scale with Gail Halvorsen, the celebrated "candy bomber" who dropped chocolates down to German children during the 1948 Berlin airlift. And despite doubts expressed in the Newsweek piece about Wiggles's identity ("someone who says he's a military intelligence soldier"), the man is authentic. The Chief (whose real name is classified for security reasons) serves in Utah's 141st military intelligence battalion (National Guard) and is currently working as an interrogator and debriefer at a palace in Baghdad. But on one occasion, he witnessed a poor girl crying and was so moved he wanted to gather up some toys for her. He then made mention of this idea of giving even more toys to more children on his blog, and thousands of people from around the world responded, all wanting to know how they could help.
To date, the Chief's "Operation Give," a newly set-up nonprofit organization, and "Share Joys Through Toys" effort has yielded more than 800 packages from overseas. Even Federal Express has gotten involved by shipping some of the packages from the United States free of charge.
Hundreds of toys have been distributed to a children's hospital in Baghdad, among other venues. "As we went down each hall and ward of the hospital, our following grew behind us as the word of our arrival spread like wild fire," writes Wiggles. "Unfortunately, due to the sheer number of people, we were unable to deliver toys to every employee or family member who desired something. We were there to make sure each and every sick child got a toy. The kids were great. Yes, there were many very sad situations causing me to cry inside for the kids, but there were smiles indicating their happiness to see us with the toys."
Wiggles humbly describes himself as "one individual trying to make a difference" and believes that "one person's seemingly insignificant positive actions can exponentially initiate a rippling of positive energy." Call him benevolent, noble, or selfless. Just don't call him boosterish.