Jeffrey Gedmin, a frequent contributor to THE WEEKLY STANDARD and the president of Radio Free Europe, has a must-read in today's Washington Post. Gedmin writes of the "bickering" in Washington over funding democracy promotion efforts inside Iran:
In the 1980s and early 1990s, the Iranian regime moved hard against exiles, killing Iranian citizens in numerous European countries. Iran's foreign minister, when he was ambassador to Turkey in the late 1980s, was expelled when it was discovered that he was involved in nabbing Iranian dissidents. Such activities, unfortunately, do not seem to have stopped; Iranian authorities have discouraged Parnaz Azima from returning to Farda.
In this context, it can be disheartening to witness the endless bickering in Washington over how to help Iranian civil society. It is strange to hear the outcry from some who rail against the U.S. government's earmark of $75 million to aid the effort. That seems a paltry sum considering the importance and magnitude of the task at hand. Does the regime use this modest support as a pretext to crack down on dissidents? Of course it does. That's what dictators do. All of us are still waiting for those flawless and risk-free alternatives.
Our Farda team is hardly a monolith. Our roughly three dozen colleagues include social democrats, monarchists, passionate pro-Americans and ardent critics of the U.S. president and his policies. Our youngest employee is 23, the oldest 73. One thing unites this diverse group: the conviction that Iran deserves a decent, accountable government and a political system far freer and more tolerant than the current one. For some that sounds like the dirty words "regime change." That's a pity. I thought we all liked "soft power," especially after Iraq. Many of us think this work still represents America at its best.
This goes to the heart of the intense debate we are having right now in Congress about whether or not we should be giving support to dissidents and democrats inside Iran. Senate Democrats stripped the president's $75 million request earlier this year by two-thirds. Senator Lieberman fought successfully on the floor to restore those funds two weeks ago. Now the rumor is that Senate Dems are going to try to strip the money, again, as soon as the bill is safely behind closed doors, in House-Senate conference. The Gedmin op-ed makes a concise and powerful case about why this is so wrong-headed.
