September 15, 2008 • Vol. 14, No. 1 Download Now! (pdf)

 

EDITORIAL
Thanks, Guys
by William Kristol

SCRAPBOOK
Sarah Palin's Foreign Policy Team

ARTICLES
McCain Finds the Right Wingman
by Stephen F. Hayes

A Party of Mavericks
by Fred Barnes

Axis of Honor
by Noemie Emery

Punishing Russia
by Gary Schmitt

Biden's One Accomplishment
by Eli Lehrer

Tax Cuts, Real and Imaginary
by Newt Gingrich & Peter Ferrara

FEATURES
Game Changer
by Jessica Gavora

Among the Paultards
by Matt Labash

Why They Hate Her
by Jeffrey Bell

BOOKS & ARTS
Who Gets In
by Peter Skerry

Alien Nation
by Shawn Macomber

Founders Afloat
by Joseph F. Callo

Poet of Reason
by Wyatt Prunty

Dearly Beloved
by Erin Montgomery

CASUAL
Down in the Boondocks
by Philip Terzian

CORRESPONDENCE
Campaign finance and more

PARODY
'US Weekly' Salutes Stalin


« On Iraq Funds, Democratic Leaders Dance the Five Step | Main | Democrats Get a Warning from a Friend »

Turf Wars

Our friend Noah Shachtman has a post up at The Danger Room about the cat fight raging between the Army and the Air Force over which branch ought to oversee the military's ever growing fleet of UAVs (I highly recommend clicking through--really helpful illustrations).

The Air Force tried, a few years back, to assume the mantle, only to get slapped down. So now the flyboys have come back with a more modest proposal: Give us control of all the drones that fly higher than 3,500.
No dice, Brig. Gen. Stephen Mundt, director of army aviation, told Reuters on the 23rd. "Don't get into the tactical (ground) commander's fight... Don't get into the way we do business."

Then the Air Force counterattack:

William Ackerman, an Air Force spokesman, called Gen. Mundt's comments as "a bit perplexing." But that was just the start of the service's counter-strike.
By last Thursday, Air Combat Command chief Gen. Ronald Keys was warning "that unless one service — his — is in charge of orchestrating UAVs, midair collisions with manned aircraft and 'frequency fratricide' of jamming each other’s communications [would be] inevitable," according to Air Force magazine.

All very interesting, but I would say that this particular turf war is small potatoes compared to the one brewing over who will command the military's future cyberwarriors. Air Force magazine has published a fascinating article on war in the third domain--cyberspace. Hampton Stephens writes that,

The Air Force’s goal is plain: to be able to operate in and, if necessary, dominate this nebulous, artificial “place” in which humans interact over networks without regard to physical geography. It is USAF’s third domain of combat.
[Secretary of the Air Force] Wynne and [Air Force chief of staff] Moseley on Dec. 7, 2005 published a new mission statement for the service. In it, cyberspace joined “air” and “space” in the catalog of Air Force domains. They said that the Air Force, from now on, would “fly and fight in air, space, and cyberspace.”

But the other services are clearly dubious of the Air Force's claim to cyberspace:

Marine Corps Gen. James E. Cartwright, head of US Strategic Command and thus the nation’s top cyber warfighter, sees dangers in spreading such expertise.
“When you train a person to be good in this environment it’s not unlike the Manhattan Project,” said Cartwright. “You’ve given them the keys to the kingdom.”

If the Air Force and Army are, a hundred years later, still arguing over which should have control over what aircraft, how long will it take to resolve which branch of the military ought to control a domain as "nebulous" as cyberspace.

Email the article Turf Wars to a friend:

Send this article to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


 
Contributors
Editor:
Michael Goldfarb

Contributors:
Dean Barnett
Jennifer Chou
Brian Faughnan
Ulf Gartzke
Reuben F. Johnson
Thomas Joscelyn
Stuart Koehl
John Noonan
Bill Roggio
Samantha Sault
Search
Archives
Contact
wws@weeklystandard.com
Categories
Feeds: Atom | RSS
[What is this?]
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2