July 7, 2008 -
July 14, 2008 • Vol. 13, No. 41 Download Now! (pdf)

 

EDITORIAL
An Indecent Decision
by Matthew Continetti

SCRAPBOOK
Buckminster Fuller, Justice Anthony Kennedy

ARTICLES
Closing the Enthusiasm Gap
by Stephen F. Hayes

Very Retiring Republicans
by Fred Barnes

McCain, Obama, & the Catholic Vote
by Ryan T. Anderson

History's Fall Guys
by Dean Barnett

Shaken and Stirred Up
by Reuben F. Johnson

A Heaping Bowl of Mush
by Philip Terzian

Laughter at the Supreme Court
by Lee Ross

FEATURES
L'Affaire Enderlin
by Anne-Elisabeth Moutet

BOOKS & ARTS
Talking Politics
by Christopher Hitchens

Isn't That Special?
by Andrew Roberts

Boris the Good
by Andrew Nagorski

After the Fox
by Edward Short

Unholy Thoughts
by Stefan Beck

Speak the Speech
by Judy Bachrach

Rhymers' Dictionary
by John Simon

Keeping Score
by James M. Banner Jr.

Here's My Plan
by Matthew Continetti

Identity Theft
by Edith Alston

Cops on the Case
by Jon L. Breen

CASUAL
Lost in the Personasphere
by Andrew Ferguson

PARODY
Fred Flintstone wins McCain's eco-challenge


« Democrats Continue Misdirection on Iraq | Main | Senators Take Hard Line on Iran »

Message Carriers

It's that time of the year. The U.S. is rotating its carriers based in the Persian Gulf, and the media automatically assumes this represents an "escalation of force" as the number of carriers in the region increases. Breathless reporting in the media sensationally mentions there are now three carriers inside the Gulf, and how this is a strong message to the Iranian government.

web_070706-N-0535P-064.jpg
(July 6, 2007) The USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) transits
through the Atlantic Ocean. It will arrive in the Gulf by fall.

But the Iranian government has nothing to fear. The Iranians should start sweating when the U.S. Navy begins to pull all of its carriers back from the Persian Gulf, not when it sends more in. This, in fact, would be the signal that the U.S. is prepared to attack.

The geography dictates this. The carriers have far less room to maneuver while stationed in the Gulf, and are far more susceptible to the array of Iran's coastal missile batteries. While the U.S. is confident it can defeat Iran's anti-ship missiles, there is no such thing as certainty. Just ask the Israelis after they lost a warship in an attack by an Iranian-manned C-802 anti-ship cruise missile, which is an Iranian-made variant of the Chinese Silkworm, during the Israel-Hezbollah War last summer.

U.S. aircraft carriers are capital ships--a $9 Billion dollar plus investment when fully-loaded, not to mention the thousands of sailors and Marines stationed on board. The U.S. Navy wouldn't risk leaving multiple carriers in the Gulf if it decided to launch a full fledged operation against Iran's nuclear program. Fighters and attack aircraft launched from the carrier decks can be refueled using carrier-based or ground-based aerial tankers. While this might have a marginal impact on effectiveness, it reduce the risk of losing a capital ship to almost zero. Finally, if the Iranians decided to block the Strait of Hormuz by, say, sinking a large tanker in the narrow channel, the U.S. Navy would have carriers trapped in the Gulf until the straits could be cleared. The Navy would be unlikely to risk one ship in the Gulf, let alone three.

Email the article Message Carriers to a friend:

Send this article to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


 
Contributors
Editor:
Michael Goldfarb

Contributors:
Dean Barnett
Jennifer Chou
Brian Faughnan
Ulf Gartzke
Reuben F. Johnson
Thomas Joscelyn
Stuart Koehl
John Noonan
Bill Roggio
Samantha Sault
Search
Archives
Contact
wws@weeklystandard.com
Categories
Feeds: Atom | RSS
[What is this?]
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2