The Blog

Peace is Dangerous

11:55 AM, Oct 1, 2007 • By BRIAN FAUGHNAN
Single Page Print Larger Text Smaller Text Alerts

As the level of American casualties in Iraq falls to its lowest level in more than a year, while Iraqi casualties fall as well, Erick at Red State notes that as tragic as the loss of life is, the final year of the Carter administration saw greater losses of life among U.S. soldiers than any year of the Bush administration so far:

Did you know that more members of the military were killed in Jimmy Carter's last year in the White House than in any of the years we've been fighting in Iraq? Think about that. In the peaceful year of 1980, 2,392 servicemen died while on duty defending our country. In 2003, the start of the Iraq War, only 1,228 servicemen and women died. In 2004, the number was 1,874, it went up to 1,942 in 2005, and it dropped to 1,858 in 2006.

In fact, only during the Clinton years of 1996 into the Bush years of 2001 and 2002, during a period of time when the Clinton policy of refusing to defend our national interest was in place, do we see the number of military deaths fall below 1000 annually.

During the 1980's, when we aggressively defended the peace against the Soviets, the number of military deaths routinely topped 2000, with a high in 1983, the year of the Marine barracks bombing in Lebanon, topping out at 2,465.

While no American servicemen and women were killed by hostile action in 1980, we lost many more in deaths by accident, homicide, and suicide than is the case today. It's true that the total number of people in the military was significantly higher under President Carter, but the decline in fatalities outside of hostile action is greater than can be explained simply by a reduction in the size of the military.

More by Brian Faughnan