December 8, 2008 • Vol. 14, No. 12 Download Now! (pdf)

 

EDITORIAL
Before He Goes
by William Kristol

SCRAPBOOK
Sally Quinn, Media Bias, etc.

ARTICLES
Obama's Good Students
by Joseph Epstein

To the Shores of Tripoli . . .
by Seth Cropsey

The Obama Jolt
by Fred Barnes

Wrinklies at Work
by Irwin M. Stelzer

The Marriage Juggernaut
by Kevin Vance

Remember the Holodomor
by Cathy Young

FEATURES
Columbia University, Slumlord
by Jonathan V. Last

BOOKS & ARTS
Friendly Persuasion
by Claudia Anderson

America's Teams
by Max Boot

Does She, or . . . ?
by Pia Catton

Over There
by Andrew Nagorski

Pigs Without Blankets
by Terry Eastland

Tania Unleashed
by Peter Collier

It's Killing Time
by James Grant

Biomorality
by Steven Lenzner

Vulture Culture
by Judy Bachrach

Tin Lizzie Tales
by Richard Striner

Taken on Faith
by Joseph Loconte

Tunnel Revision
by Stephen Schwartz

Just One More
by Charlotte Hays

CASUAL
Fried Bread Lines
by Christopher Caldwell

PARODY
Tax tips from Charlie


« Brits Unleash the MQ-9 | Main | The Dilbert Congress Shifts Focus »

M4 Carbine Still Sucks

WWS pal and frequent DAILY STANDARD contributor Christian Lowe had an excellent piece on the M4 Carbine at Military.com on Wednesday. The crux of it:

The primary weapon carried by most soldiers into battle in Iraq andAfghanistan performed the worst in a recent series of tests designed to see how it stacked up against three other top carbines in sandy environments.

After firing 6,000 rounds through ten M4s in a dust chamber at the Army's Aberdeen test center in Maryland this fall, the weapons experienced a total of 863 minor stoppages and 19 that would have required the armorer to fix the problem. Stacked up against the M4 during the side-by-side tests were two other weapons popular with special operations forces, including the Heckler and Koch 416 and the FN USA Special Operations Combat Assault Rifle, or Mk16....

"This isn't brain surgery -- a rifle needs to do three things: shoot when you pull the trigger, put bullets where you aim them and deliver enough energy to stop what's attacking you," the staffer told Military.com in an email. "If the M4 can't be depended on to shoot then everything else is irrelevant."

The staffer offered a different perspective of how to view the Army's result. If you look at the numbers, he reasoned, the M4's 882 total stoppages averages out to a jam every 68 rounds. There are about 30 rounds per magazine in the M4.

Lowe also notes "some grumbling about the stopping power of its 5.56mm round." Since Mogadishu, the M4 has been criticized for its lack of stopping power ("Like stabbing a guy with an icepick") which was detailed in Black Hawk Down, among other places. Little known fact: with the exception of the Browning Automatic Rifle and the M1 Garand Rifle, U.S. infantry weapons have uniformly sucked since the end of the First World War. Almost every decent weapon we have or have ever fielded is in fact derivative of some foreign weapon. The M249 SAW, for instance, is a Belgian FN Minimi. The M60 machinegun is a dumbed-down version of the German MG42 (a weapon that was panned by Aberdeen Proving Ground back in 1943--after it had killed about 10,000 American troops in North Africa and Sicily). I don't know what it is, but there is something about the Army's small arms development process that promotes mediocrity.

Email the article M4 Carbine Still Sucks to a friend:

Send this article to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


 
Contributors
Editor (on leave):
Michael Goldfarb

Deputy Editors:
John McCormack
Samantha Sault

Contributors:
Dean Barnett
Jennifer Chou
Brian Faughnan
Ulf Gartzke
Reuben F. Johnson
Thomas Joscelyn
Stuart Koehl
John Noonan
Bill Roggio
Jaime Sneider
Search
Archives
Contact
wws@weeklystandard.com
Categories
Feeds: Atom | RSS
[What is this?]
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2