July 13, 2009 • Vol. 14, No. 40 Download Now! (pdf)

 

EDITORIAL
On Obama's Watch
by William Kristol

SCRAPBOOK
The 'Argentine Firecracker'

ARTICLES
Questioning Sotomayor
by Robert F. Nagel

Reversing Sotomayor
by Terry Eastland

A Good Niebuhr Policy
by Matthew Continetti

Tehran Needs to Stop Meddling
by Jonathan Schanzer & Howard Gumnitzky

What If Writing Were Like TV?
by P.J. O'Rourke

The Triumph of Crony Capitalism
by Fred Barnes

FEATURES
Bibi's Choice
by Peter Berkowitz

To Board or Not to Board?
by Jeremy Rabkin & Mario Loyola

BOOKS & ARTS
Rebel With a Cause
by John O'Sullivan

Seeing It Now
by Terry Teachout

Additional Splendor
by James Gardner

Touch of Evil
by Stephen F. Hayes

Sacha Kidder
by John Podhoretz

CASUAL
Michael and Me
by Jonathan V. Last

CORRESPONDENCE
Fortune 500, Rousseau & more

PARODY
Mark Sanford's inbox


« Should We Have Sunk Those Iranian Ships? | Main | Diplowimps Polled »

A Fitting End for Ron Paul

Dean Barnett captured the Ron Paul phenomenon best with this analysis, appropriately titled "The 'Don't Tase Me, Bro' Candidate." But now the New Republic's Jamie Kirchick has finally found the documents that prove what most of us knew all along: Dr. Paul isn't just kooky, he's deranged. (You may not be able to get through to the TNR server, probably because it's been spiked by Drudge traffic though I don't discount the possibility that the Ron Paul blimp has met its fate in some kind of kamikaze mission against the TNR offices.) Kirchick found the documents at the University of Kansas and the Wisconsin Historical Society, and while they often contain no bylines, they are published in Ron Paul's name, and frequently written in the first person:

[W]hoever actually wrote them, the newsletters I saw all had one thing in common: They were published under a banner containing Paul's name, and the articles (except for one special edition of a newsletter that contained the byline of another writer) seem designed to create the impression that they were written by him--and reflected his views. What they reveal are decades worth of obsession with conspiracies, sympathy for the right-wing militia movement, and deeply held bigotry against blacks, Jews, and gays. In short, they suggest that Ron Paul is not the plain-speaking antiwar activist his supporters believe they are backing--but rather a member in good standing of some of the oldest and ugliest traditions in American politics.

I won't reproduce the quotes here, but there is no plausible explanation that might insulate Paul from the fallout. Kirchick and others attacked Paul a few months back over his failure to return a $500 check from a prominent white supremacist. At the time, Paul had explained that he couldn't possibly screen ever donor. Of course he couldn't, but the media had screened this one for him, and he refused to give back the money anyway. Now we know why. He's been speaking in code to the dregs of American society this whole time. And he had no intention of alienating his base of support.

Email the article A Fitting End for Ron Paul to a friend:

Send this article to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


 
Categories
Search
Archives
Contact
wws@weeklystandard.com
Subscribe to this blog's feed
[What is this?]
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2