May 19, 2008 • Vol. 13, No. 34 Download Now! (pdf)

 

COVER
A Counterinsurgency Grows in Khost
by Ann Marlowe

EDITORIAL
Countering Iran
by Reuel Marc Gerecht

SCRAPBOOK
JFK's foibles, the PC police, etc.

ARTICLES
Gloomy Republicans
by Fred Barnes

The War Over the War (cont.)
by Reihan Salam

We're All Gun Nuts Now
by John McCormack

What to Expect When You're Expecting...
by Lawrence B. Lindsey

FEATURES
They Backed Boris
by James Kirchick

Jeremiah Wright's 'Trumpet'
by Stanley Kurtz

BOOKS & ARTS
Trouble Down Below
by Mark Falcoff

The Strategist
by Daniel Sullivan

Hollywood Hybrid
by Joe Queenan

Weapon of Choice
by Joan Frawley Desmond

'Orfeo' at 400
by Algis Valiunas

A $uperhero's Saga
by John Podhoretz

CASUAL
Agenbites
by Joseph Bottum

CORRESPONDENCE
Rev. Wright, patriotic newsman, and more

PARODY
Mars attacks the global candy market


« The Year of Military Exercises | Main | Thompson's Closing Argument (UPDATED) »

Bush Considers Canceling Earmarks

Roll Call reports that the White House is considering a bold move to cancel billions in wasteful pork-barrel spending in order to boost the economy:

The White House may link a possible executive order eliminating thousands of earmarks with a call for reprogramming the funding, perhaps through a direct rebate to taxpayers or by putting the savings into children’s health care or bridge repair programs, according to House and Senate Republicans close to the issue.

Although no final decision has been made on whether President Bush will in fact sign an executive order, Republicans said it is increasingly likely and that discussions of linking it to a taxpayer rebate or funding reprogramming indicate Bush may be looking to make fiscal responsibility a centerpiece of his domestic legacy.

Canceling about $20 billion in pork-barrel spending might help restore the party's 'brand' on fiscal responsibility. That can only be a good thing. But the reason to disregard the suggestions of Congressional committees is that those suggestions are wasteful. If the White House can redirect those funds to spur economic growth and job creation, so much the better. If not, it's still better either to rescind the money and commit it to deficit reduction, or to spend it on more important priorities through the agency process.

However, the value of the idea outlined here is that it will put Congress on the spot about their spending priorities. If the White House proposes to save billions, and channel that money instead toward tax breaks for investment, or individual rebates, or some other meritorious effort, Congress will be forced to address the question. They can either defend their earmarks in the light of day, or give them up and spend the money on other initiatives. The taxpayers are better served with an honest debate.

There's more on the status of the debate over economic stimulus today at the Wall Street Journal, and Senator Jim DeMint also penned a recent op-ed on Congress' addiction to earmarks; be sure to check it out. Lastly, for some of the horror stories about how Congress has elected to spend your money, check out omnibusting.org.

Email the article Bush Considers Canceling Earmarks to a friend:

Send this article to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


 
Contributors
Editor:
Michael Goldfarb

Contributors:
Dean Barnett
Jennifer Chou
Brian Faughnan
Ulf Gartzke
Reuben F. Johnson
Thomas Joscelyn
Stuart Koehl
John Noonan
Bill Roggio
Samantha Sault
Search
Archives
Contact
wws@weeklystandard.com
Categories
Feeds: Atom | RSS
[What is this?]
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2