May 12, 2008 • Vol. 13, No. 33 Download Now! (pdf)

 

COVER
A Hero's Life
by Ken Ringle

EDITORIAL
Right about Obama
by Matthew Continetti

SCRAPBOOK
Acknowledgments, imagined influence, etc.

ARTICLES
Disenfranchised Over There
by Hans A. von Spakovsky & Roman Buhler

Attack of the Pharmascolds
by David A. Shaywitz & Thomas P. Stossel

South Africa Plays Ball with Dictators
by Marian L. Tupy & James Kirchick

The Silent Scream of the Asparagus
by Wesley J. Smith

FEATURES
An Exceedingly Strange New Respect
by Noemie Emery

Just Like Us! Really?
by Robert Satloff

Advice for the Nuclear Abolitionists
by Henry Sokolski & Gary Schmitt

BOOKS & ARTS
Radical Revision
by Ronald Radosh

Out of This World
by Joseph Bottum

Balancing Act
by David Guaspari

Reverent Billy
by Loredana Vuoto

'Matrix' on Wheels
by John Podhoretz

CASUAL
Prom Night
by Matt Labash

CORRESPONDENCE
Tribes, McCainomics, and more

PARODY
Rev. Wright on the ancient Italians


« Obama's Flip-Flops on Public Financing | Main | Chait Gets It »

A Thought on McCain's Speech

He said: "Those who claim we should withdraw from Iraq in order to fight Al Qaeda more effectively elsewhere are making a dangerous mistake. Whether they were there before is immaterial, al Qaeda is in Iraq now, as it is in the borderlands between Pakistan and Afghanistan, in Somalia, and in Indonesia."

Whether they were there before is immaterial. I understand the point. He said several weeks ago that while he still believes that going to war in Iraq was the right thing to do he wasn't going to spend his time now debating whether it was a wise thing to do. I get that, too.

But lines like the ones above strike me as unnecessary and unwise. We know al Qaeda was in Iraq before the war. Nobody disputes that. Reasonable people can disagree on how much the regime aided them in Iraq and whether Saddam Hussein knowingly gave them sanctuary in Baghdad. But Abu Musab al Zarqawi and two dozen al Qaeda members were in Baghdad before the war. There is no question about that. So taken literally the effect of McCain's statement is to turn a plain fact into a debatable issue.

But the real debate isn't about whether those two dozens jihadists were in Iraq, as McCain surely knows. It's about whether Iraq was part of the global war on terror from the beginning or is now only because we went to war there five years ago. He seems to be saying that the answer doesn't matter. But he's wrong. And the new IDA study makes clear that any serious global war on terror -- or, as McCain prefers, struggle against radical Islamic extremism -- had to include Iraq. In the twelve years before the war, Saddam Hussein was supporting an alphabet soup of jihadist terror groups across the globe -- from Abu Sayyaf in the Philippines to Ayman al Zawahiri's Egyptian Islamic Jihad to the radicals in northern Iraq to the "Sudanese fighters" he trained on Iraqi soil throughout the 1990s. This matters. And John McCain, who has a better record on Iraq than anyone else who ran for president this year and still probably doesn't get enough credit for fighting back the forces of withdrawal in the Senate last summer, should know better.

Email the article A Thought on McCain's Speech to a friend:

Send this article to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


 
Contributors
Editor:
Michael Goldfarb

Contributors:
Dean Barnett
Jennifer Chou
Brian Faughnan
Ulf Gartzke
Reuben F. Johnson
Thomas Joscelyn
Stuart Koehl
John Noonan
Bill Roggio
Samantha Sault
Search
Archives
Contact
wws@weeklystandard.com
Categories
Feeds: Atom | RSS
[What is this?]
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2