July 13, 2009 • Vol. 14, No. 40
Download Now! (pdf)

Contributors
Editor (on leave):
Michael Goldfarb

Deputy Editors:
John McCormack
Samantha Sault

Contributors:
Jennifer Chou
Brian Faughnan
Ulf Gartzke
Mary Katharine Ham
Reuben F. Johnson
Thomas Joscelyn
Stuart Koehl
John Noonan
Bill Roggio
Search
Archives
Contact
wws@weeklystandard.com
Categories
Feeds: Atom | RSS
[What is this?]



« Not Just Guilt by Association | The Blog home page | Richelieu: Hillary's Plan B »

Barack Obama = Chauncey Gardener?

It's almost starting to seem that way.

The group Judicial Watch has sought to force both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama to release the records that speak to their activities while in the White House (in Clinton's case) and the Illinois legislature (in Obama's). The only problem? There is no paperwork to speak of in Obama's case:

Judicial Watch, which has been seeking access to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (D-N.Y.) records from her time in the White House, argued Wednesday that the Illinois senator, who has criticized the former first lady for a lack of openness, has his own “records problem...”

“It appears that Obama never kept records of his time in the Illinois state legislature, or he discarded them,” Fitton stated. “Either way, he clearly intended to leave no paper trail.”

So which is it: was Obama cunningly minimizing his paper trail to protect himself from scandal and enhance his electability down the road, or was he destroying documents?

Email the article Barack Obama = Chauncey Gardener? to a friend:

Send this article to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):