May 12, 2008 • Vol. 13, No. 33 Download Now! (pdf)

 

COVER
A Hero's Life
by Ken Ringle

EDITORIAL
Right about Obama
by Matthew Continetti

SCRAPBOOK
Acknowledgments, imagined influence, etc.

ARTICLES
Disenfranchised Over There
by Hans A. von Spakovsky & Roman Buhler

Attack of the Pharmascolds
by David A. Shaywitz & Thomas P. Stossel

South Africa Plays Ball with Dictators
by Marian L. Tupy & James Kirchick

The Silent Scream of the Asparagus
by Wesley J. Smith

FEATURES
An Exceedingly Strange New Respect
by Noemie Emery

Just Like Us! Really?
by Robert Satloff

Advice for the Nuclear Abolitionists
by Henry Sokolski & Gary Schmitt

BOOKS & ARTS
Radical Revision
by Ronald Radosh

Out of This World
by Joseph Bottum

Balancing Act
by David Guaspari

Reverent Billy
by Loredana Vuoto

'Matrix' on Wheels
by John Podhoretz

CASUAL
Prom Night
by Matt Labash

CORRESPONDENCE
Tribes, McCainomics, and more

PARODY
Rev. Wright on the ancient Italians


« A Thought on McCain's Speech | Main | Hollywood Goes to War »

Chait Gets It

Jonathan Chait has a short piece at TNR on the conservative strategy for dealing with climate change:

If you want to know how little sacrifice most Republicans are willing to endure to make a dent in global warming, here is your answer. They're not even willing to take back a special interest subsidy--worth $1.3 billion per year, roughly 1 percent of the industry's annual profit--that nobody was willing to defend when it was enacted.

That's about right. There is a shift taking place within the conservative movement on this issue, but Chait largely misses the point because he can't resist harping on some boring and silly subsidy that no one on the right would care to defend or repeal. But then Chait makes a good living writing on topics that bore me to tears. The larger issue, though, is interesting. So I'll lay it out for Chait.

Conservatives have been forced to concede defeat in the debate over climate change. Americans believe in it, they believe they're responsible for it, and they want their politicians to do something about it. Which isn't to say that conservatives actually believe in global warming, just that they tend to be slightly more pragmatic than their liberal counterparts on such issues. So we're working on a new strategy, and as Chait found out, it can be boiled down to two simple words: do nothing.

If the American people want something done about climate change, they don't necessarily want to pay for it. Take for example cap and trade. It's a marvelous system for obscuring the true costs of regulation, but it clearly isn't the most effective way to reduce carbon emissions. So what happens? You get conservative economists like Steven F. Hayward and Kevin A. Hassett joining forces with far left environmentalists in agitating for a direct carbon tax. I won't assume that Hayward and Hasset have anything but pure intentions, but their position gets a lot of support from conservatives who've never advocated for a tax on anything. Cynic that I am, I think I know what's going on here.

Chait writes of Republicans, "If you're not willing to inflict a one-cent hike at the pump, you're not willing to endure any sacrifice whatsoever to reduce global warming." True, but nearly half of all Americans are not willing to endure a one-cent hike at the pump:

Forty-eight percent of Americans are unwilling to spend even a penny more in gasoline taxes to help reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, according to a new nationwide survey released today by the National Center for Public Policy Research.

So there's the strategy--and skeptics have good reason to think it'll be successful.

Email the article Chait Gets It to a friend:

Send this article to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


 
Contributors
Editor:
Michael Goldfarb

Contributors:
Dean Barnett
Jennifer Chou
Brian Faughnan
Ulf Gartzke
Reuben F. Johnson
Thomas Joscelyn
Stuart Koehl
John Noonan
Bill Roggio
Samantha Sault
Search
Archives
Contact
wws@weeklystandard.com
Categories
Feeds: Atom | RSS
[What is this?]
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2