May 19, 2008 • Vol. 13, No. 34 Download Now! (pdf)

 

COVER
A Counterinsurgency Grows in Khost
by Ann Marlowe

EDITORIAL
Countering Iran
by Reuel Marc Gerecht

SCRAPBOOK
JFK's foibles, the PC police, etc.

ARTICLES
Gloomy Republicans
by Fred Barnes

The War Over the War (cont.)
by Reihan Salam

We're All Gun Nuts Now
by John McCormack

What to Expect When You're Expecting...
by Lawrence B. Lindsey

FEATURES
They Backed Boris
by James Kirchick

Jeremiah Wright's 'Trumpet'
by Stanley Kurtz

BOOKS & ARTS
Trouble Down Below
by Mark Falcoff

The Strategist
by Daniel Sullivan

Hollywood Hybrid
by Joe Queenan

Weapon of Choice
by Joan Frawley Desmond

'Orfeo' at 400
by Algis Valiunas

A $uperhero's Saga
by John Podhoretz

CASUAL
Agenbites
by Joseph Bottum

CORRESPONDENCE
Rev. Wright, patriotic newsman, and more

PARODY
Mars attacks the global candy market


« Is Hillary Down for the Count? | Main | McCain Struggling Among Little Jerks »

Obama's Negative Coattails?

Roll Call reports on the epiphany that appears to have come over Republican campaign strategists over the last six weeks or so -- the realization that a McCain-Obama race is likely to produce a comfortable political climate for Republican candidates:

“Hillary certainly looked like she would help us a great deal when this all got started. But every day this goes by, the more Obama’s veneer starts to crack and the more he looks like just another liberal,” said Mike Slanker, political director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee. “By the time we get to October, either one of them will help us.”...

As the Democratic presidential primary drags on, Cole, the NRCC chairman, is finding company in his position that Obama — not Clinton — is a weaker nominee and the better candidate for Republicans to run against.

Cole bases his assessment on four factors. He sees Obama as farther to the left than Clinton, as a less-plausible commander in chief, as having a thinner résumé and therefore being easier to exploit politically, and as being weaker with key voting blocs, including women, senior citizens and conservative Democrats.

The Roll Call piece is good as far as it goes, but what's interesting is the dog that doesn't bark. Just a few weeks ago, the debate was over whether Obama would sweep in dozens of Democrats in swing districts on his coattails -- not how much he might help Democrats in a few seats in his home state. The fact that no one is any longer talking about a sweeping Obama win is a stunning and rapid change.

Rather, Republican strategists are looking at swing districts in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Indiana, Arizona and others. Those 4 states alone are home to 9 Democratic freshmen who will be vulnerable in their first run for re-election. The list also ignores a number of races where Republicans will be competitive regardless of how the Democratic presidential candidate fares.

Some Democrats continue to regard 2008 as a likely strong year for their candidates. They often point to party identification and the generic Congressional ballot as indicators that Democratic candidates are likely to fare well this year. But if John McCain wins the election -- by a wide or narrow margin -- it's hard to imagine this being a strong Democratic year.

Email the article Obama's Negative Coattails? to a friend:

Send this article to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


 
Contributors
Editor:
Michael Goldfarb

Contributors:
Dean Barnett
Jennifer Chou
Brian Faughnan
Ulf Gartzke
Reuben F. Johnson
Thomas Joscelyn
Stuart Koehl
John Noonan
Bill Roggio
Samantha Sault
Search
Archives
Contact
wws@weeklystandard.com
Categories
Feeds: Atom | RSS
[What is this?]
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2