July 7, 2008 -
July 14, 2008 • Vol. 13, No. 41 Download Now! (pdf)

 

EDITORIAL
An Indecent Decision
by Matthew Continetti

SCRAPBOOK
Buckminster Fuller, Justice Anthony Kennedy

ARTICLES
Closing the Enthusiasm Gap
by Stephen F. Hayes

Very Retiring Republicans
by Fred Barnes

McCain, Obama, & the Catholic Vote
by Ryan T. Anderson

History's Fall Guys
by Dean Barnett

Shaken and Stirred Up
by Reuben F. Johnson

A Heaping Bowl of Mush
by Philip Terzian

Laughter at the Supreme Court
by Lee Ross

FEATURES
L'Affaire Enderlin
by Anne-Elisabeth Moutet

BOOKS & ARTS
Talking Politics
by Christopher Hitchens

Isn't That Special?
by Andrew Roberts

Boris the Good
by Andrew Nagorski

After the Fox
by Edward Short

Unholy Thoughts
by Stefan Beck

Speak the Speech
by Judy Bachrach

Rhymers' Dictionary
by John Simon

Keeping Score
by James M. Banner Jr.

Here's My Plan
by Matthew Continetti

Identity Theft
by Edith Alston

Cops on the Case
by Jon L. Breen

CASUAL
Lost in the Personasphere
by Andrew Ferguson

PARODY
Fred Flintstone wins McCain's eco-challenge


« A Disgrace Bai Any Measure | Main | Bush at the Knesset »

Disturbing Campaign News Round-Up

Above is John McCain’s new campaign ad. In spite of Powers Boothe’s stirring narration, I have to confess to being less than thrilled with the spot. The ad boasts that at the end of John McCain’s first term, the Middle East will be “stabilized,” the nuclear terror threat “reduced,” border security “strengthened,” energy independence “advanced,” wasteful spending “reformed,” healthcare choice “delivered’ and economic confidence also “restored.” Who knows? Maybe the influence of a McCain administration will even inspire the New England Patriots to win the next four Super Bowls.

Since all of these sound like swell things, you might wonder what’s my beef. The problem is Barack Obama could run the exact same ad. Obama also wants the Middle East “stabilized” and energy independence “advanced.” The difference between the two candidates lies in what they would do to make such things happen.

To wit, Obama’s plan to restore economic confidence includes raising taxes. McCain’s doesn’t. This ad is literally devoid of substantive ideas, and refuses to draw any contrasts between the two candidates. If the two candidates stand for exactly the same things, in this year of all years the one without an “R” after his name is a long shot.

In other disturbing news, Rasmussen’s tracking numbers continue to show Obama with a one point lead over McCain. The fact that the deficit is only a single point is actually good news. The bad news is found in the internals: “Obama is supported by 71% of Democrats, McCain by 80% of Republicans.” Chances are, a bunch of those Democrats will come home after their bitter primary season has become a memory.

Rasmussen also notes, “It is amazing that McCain remains competitive at all in a year where the fundamentals so heavily favor the Democrats.” True enough. Quite by accident, the Republican party has managed to nominate its only candidate with a chance of winning the general election. A more traditional Republican or one that the public more closely associates with the tattered Republican brand would have almost no shot.

But McCain does have a shot. If, however, he runs a race trying to be “Barack Obama Light” (if you can imagine such a weightless creature), his chances will evaporate in a hurry.

Email the article Disturbing Campaign News Round-Up to a friend:

Send this article to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):


 
Contributors
Editor (on leave):
Michael Goldfarb

Deputy Editors:
John McCormack
Samantha Sault

Contributors:
Dean Barnett
Jennifer Chou
Brian Faughnan
Ulf Gartzke
Reuben F. Johnson
Thomas Joscelyn
Stuart Koehl
John Noonan
Bill Roggio
Jaime Sneider
Search
Archives
Contact
wws@weeklystandard.com
Categories
Feeds: Atom | RSS
[What is this?]
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2