December 8, 2008 • Vol. 14, No. 12
Download Now! (pdf)

Contributors
Editor (on leave):
Michael Goldfarb

Deputy Editors:
John McCormack
Samantha Sault

Contributors:
Jennifer Chou
Brian Faughnan
Ulf Gartzke
Mary Katharine Ham
Reuben F. Johnson
Thomas Joscelyn
Stuart Koehl
John Noonan
Bill Roggio
Search
Archives
Contact
wws@weeklystandard.com
Categories
Feeds: Atom | RSS
[What is this?]



« Are the Oil Companies Refusing to Drill? | The Blog home page | Gallup and the Congressional Generic Ballot »

Not a Parody!

Using grown-up words on standardized tests in Britain get kids extra-credit, not detention.

Peter Buckroyd, chief examiner of English for the Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (AQA), an examination board, said swear words should gain positive marks if the spelling and punctuation is correct.

In one case a pupil who wrote a two-word obscenity in answer to the question "Describe the room you're sitting in", on a 2006 GCSE paper was given two marks out a possible 27 for the expletive, 7.5 per cent, by Mr Buckroyd.

Had he punctuated it with an exclamation mark this would have risen to 11 per cent.

And if he had used three exclamation points, one imagines the AQA would have awarded the boy a passing mark. On math tests, do graders give partial credit to students, asked to find x, who circle it in the equation and write, "there it is"? How many points for YGTBFKM?

Email the article Not a Parody! to a friend:

Send this article to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):