Required Reading: Liebermania? A Matter of Trust

From National Review, "The Lieberman Option" by Rich Lowry

From The Politico, "McCain Alarms Base with Abortion Comment" by Jonathan Martin

From Commentary, "The Argument for Lieberman" by John Podhoretz

First from the Politico:

Top social conservative leaders in key battleground states are urging John McCain not to pick a running mate who supports abortion rights, warning of dire consequences from a Republican base already unenthused about their nominee.

McCain's comments Wednesday to the Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes that former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge's pro-abortion rights views wouldn't necessarily rule him out quickly found their way into the in-boxes of Christian conservatives. For those who have been anxiously awaiting McCain's pick as a signal of his ideological intentions, there was deep concern that their worst fears about the Arizona senator may be realized.

"It absolutely floored me," said Phil Burress, head of the Ohio-based Citizens for Community Values. "It would doom him in Ohio."

Now Lowry:

To placate Republicans and maximize the political impact of his selection, Lieberman would have to join the ticket as part of a McCain pledge to serve just one term. Both McCain and Lieberman would promise not to run for president in 2012, removing any possibility of Lieberman becoming a successor or putting his imprint on the Republican Party. Their administration would be above electoral politics, a high-minded exercise in competent governance and bipartisan compromise.

To assuage Republican fears of a Harrison/Tyler scenario, Lieberman would have to pledge, if he were to ascend to the presidency, to appoint constitutionalist judges and honor McCain's domestic priorities.

The possibility of a one-term pledge is actively bruited around McCain headquarters. The thinking is that there is no more dramatic way to augment his standing as a different kind of a politician and capture the public's frustration with politics as usual. (Realistically, at age 76, McCain might not want to run for re-election anyway.)

FIRST, LET ME GIVE you the simplistic (not mention optimistic) checkers-playing view of a McCain/Lieberman ticket as it concerns social conservatives:

The risks of McCain selecting a pro-choice running mate boil down to one thing - exactly how unacceptable is Barack Obama to social conservatives? As conservatives are well aware, Ronald Reagan isn't on the ballot this year. In John McCain, the Republican standard bearer is someone who disquiets a lot of different Republicans for a lot of different reasons.

McCain's biggest leg-up with the conservative base isn't the enthusiasm that he engenders but rather how squeamish the right feels about Obama. In a recent email exchange with an undecided voter, my correspondent described himself as "violently unimpressed" with Obama. That elegant turn of phrase wonderfully captured a crucial dynamic as November approaches. Many conservatives won't cast their votes for McCain with great enthusiasm, but they may be highly enthusiastic about voting against Obama. To such voters, chancing the presidency on such an inexperienced and unimpressive figure at this historical juncture is unthinkable.

The fact is, there are only two choices this year unless we count Barr and Nader and why would we do that? The Rasmussen tracking polls have shown Republicans coming home to McCain in great numbers - the Maverick actually does better among Republicans than Obama does with Democrats. It's indeed unlikely that social conservatives will decide to cast their ballots for Barack Obama. Frankly, it's unimaginable. So the question then becomes, how far can McCain push his luck with a particular segment of Republican base voters and still have them show up in November?