The Blog

Ready for Rapid Economic Growth?

12:00 AM, Mar 22, 2014 • By IRWIN M. STELZER
Widget tooltip
Single Page Print Larger Text Smaller Text Alerts

We now know a lot more about the probable course of the economy than we did a few months ago, and are likely to learn even more in the next few weeks when the jobs report is released on April 4.

One thing we do know is that weather matters, at least extreme weather of the snowy sort that afflicted a good part of America in recent months. But now spring has sprung, the grass has riz, and merchants and car dealers can stop wondering where the customers is, to borrow a bit of doggerel from Ogden Nash. For the next few quarters that particular headwind to more rapid growth will not have the chilling effect on the economy that it has had in past quarters.

Second, we know that our foreseeable future includes zero-to-low interest rates. And not only because stock and bond markets were spooked into sell-offs when Janet Yellen the new Fed chair (Yellen has instructed her staff to use that gender-neutral title when addressing her) made a novice’s error at her first press conference. She responded to a request to define the “considerable period” that will elapse before the Fed raises rates by suggesting that the rates might start up this Fall, sooner than markets had been expecting. She forgot the first rule of policy-makers’ forecasting: give ‘em a number, or give ‘em a date, but never ever give ‘em both a number and a date. Her hint of action sooner rather than later notwithstanding, there is little doubt that the Fed will keep rates unusually low, rising if at all very slowly, as markets realized within 24 hours and bounced back.

·     Thirteen of the sixteen members of the monetary policy committee, or Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) in the technical jargon of the central bank, do not expect to raise rates until 2015. That gives Yellen a solid majority of members who want to avoid an increase in interest rates until next year.

·     A fall in the unemployment rate to 6.5 percent will no longer trigger a tightening of policy. The unemployment rate is only one indicator, and these days not a very good one, of the strength of the labor market. A drop in the unemployment rate produced by a continued fall in the labor force participation rate is not good news. A drop in the headline unemployment rate while many people are involuntarily working part-time is not unambiguous good news.  Neither is an increase in the portion of the unemployed who have been out-of-work for an extended period, or the failure of wages to rise. All of these indicators will have to be flashing good news before the FOMC considers raising rates, which Yellen promises will be only at a moderate pace. Doubt that and re-read Yellen’s many strong statements on the socially and economically devastating effects of less than full employment.

·     Yellen also believes that monetary policy must be kept loose because fiscal policy is too tight. She has in the past characterized current fiscal policy as “unusually restrictive … an unusual drag”, and last week said it is “tighter than would be expected. That lines her up with President Obama and hawkish Republicans who desire to avoid cuts in the military budget has increased now that Vladimir Putin has torn up the boundary settlements that have prevailed since World War II.

·     The Fed will only consider the economy discharged from the intensive care unit when inflation has risen from its current rate of around 1 percent to the Fed’s 2 percent target, and “maximum employment” prevails, which Yellen wisely declined to quantify: my guess is that means an unemployment rate of 5 percent and a steadily rising work force participation rate. Even when these goals are reached, the Fed will try to keep interest rates low to make certain the recovery is durable.

Of course, it is always possible that Fed policy will change. Members of the monetary policy committee claim to be “data-driven,” or, in ordinary language, their views are subject to change without much notice. Those views are based on forecasts regularly revised as reality bites (revisions are forecasters’ way of never having to say I’m sorry for my earlier, erroneous forecast.)  Remember: at the same time as Yellen offered future guidance she announced the abandonment of previous guidance. Some critics wonder if the guidance game, which consists of opaque descriptions of policies based on fallible forecasts, isn’t doing more harm than good.

Recent Blog Posts

The Weekly Standard Archives

Browse 19 Years of the Weekly Standard

Old covers